Forum:TC:Unidentified Jedi (Form VII practitioner)

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Unidentified Jedi (Form VII practitioner)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was No consensus. Imperators II(Talk) 07:45, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Unidentified Jedi (Form VII practitioner) (talk - history - links - logs - delete - protect)

Page created off of a trading card illustration that has no background information whatsoever. The only content of substance on the article is speculation. Dentface (talk) 21:55, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Delete

  1. As nominator. Dentface (talk) 21:55, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
    Rsand 30 (talk) 21:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
  2. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 21:58, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
  3. Samonic ChissAscendancyCanonSymbol 22:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
  4. It is a Jedi at the time of the original trilogy, but meh, best left to other articles to document. OOM 224 22:08, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
  5. Supreme Emperor Holocomm 22:17, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
  6. Wok142 (talk) 22:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
  7. We also have precedent of deleting non-notable Jedi of the Imperial Era Lewisr (talk) 15:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
  8. Started looking at precedents and my own votes from 2020, and... you can take that gasp back, sorry. NanoLuukeCloning facility 16:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
  9. Asithol (talk) 00:27, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Keep

  1. GCW jedi and practitioner of a form that has low usage Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:48, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
  2. Per the precedent of keeping articles for Imperial-era Force-users. Imperators II(Talk) 13:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
  3. VergenceScatter (talk) 15:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
  4. Per precedent Rsand 30 (talk) 15:38, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
    Yes, I'm voting keep, and I want an audible gasp in the audience! NanoLuukeCloning facility 16:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
    Gasp, you traitor OOM 224 16:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
  5. Imperial era force user. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 13:56, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
  6. JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 06:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
  7. Aruteous 20px Holoterminal 14:05, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Comments

I could be wrong, but I thought I saw somewhere that all post Clone Wars Jedi are notable since there were so few. SaintSirNicholas (talk) 22:09, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

  • Nod, I vaguely remember a TC where we voted to keep an unidentified Jedi from a card game like this based on exactly this rationale. OOM 224 22:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)