Forum:TC:Unidentified GNK power droid (Mos Eisley)

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Unidentified GNK power droid (Mos Eisley)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:48, January 18, 2014 (UTC)

Unidentified GNK power droid (Mos Eisley) (talk - history - links - logs)

This droid is barely visible, and doesn't do a single thing. We gain nothing from having this article.

Delete

  1. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 04:11, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:16, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 04:21, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Powering up the Administrative Death Ray—er, delete button. —MJ— Training Room 04:28, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Manoof (talk) 10:35, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
  6. 1358 (Talk) 11:10, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
  7. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 17:31, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
  8. We're talking about the one behind the guy right? Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 20:15, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
  9. Supreme Emperor (talk) 20:52, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
  10. —Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 04:33, January 12, 2014 (UTC)
  11. Trip391 (talk) 09:02, January 12, 2014 (UTC)
  12. Cute but still.. DIE! Winterz (talk) 18:23, January 12, 2014 (UTC)
  13. CC7567 (talk) 07:09, January 13, 2014 (UTC)
  14. Cuz it's just there. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 23:46, January 15, 2014 (UTC)
  15. Fails uniqueness clause in the notability policy I like to imagine really exists. —Silly Dan (talk) 01:18, January 16, 2014 (UTC)
    • I'd like to nominate that for QOTD. - Esjs(Talk) 17:11, January 16, 2014 (UTC)
  16. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:19, January 16, 2014 (UTC)
  17. Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:48, January 18, 2014 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Cuz it's there. KEJ (talk) 18:06, January 12, 2014 (UTC)
    • ..unlike your counter-argument. Do you care to elaborate why you've been opposing all of the TCs? It would be nice to understand what's going on within your mind and see what is your perspective. Thanks. Winterz (talk) 18:27, January 12, 2014 (UTC)
      • I have not opposed all of the TCs. Anyway, the motivation behind my votes have always been to ensure that Wookieepedia remains the ultimate source of SW in-universe information (and some out-of-universe information). I'm not going to enter into an extensive discussion here... last time that happened, another user got blocked by an admin. I don't want that to happen again. KEJ (talk) 18:47, January 12, 2014 (UTC)

Discussion