Forum:TC:Unidentified Dilonexa planets

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:09, February 10, 2014 (UTC)

Unidentified Dilonexa planets

Some source mentioned that there were 40 planets in the system and that 22 were too hot for life and 17 were too cold. That does not mean that we need an article on every freaking one. There's no way to write these things up for status without simply repeating the same stuff over and over. The first 22 would all say the exact same thing, just in different ways. Same goes for the last 17. #23 is named and has unique information, so it's notable. The rest of these aren't. —MJ— ^{Jedi Council Chambers} 07:11, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

Delete all

1. As nominator. —MJ— ^{Jedi Council Chambers} 07:11, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
2. While I did nominate one of these articles to status, I no longer believe that they should have articles. Mentioning the planets in two groups in the system article should be plenty in this case.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 07:15, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
3. As a comparison of the mean temperatures of Mercury and Venus will show, we can't even be completely certain which planets are in which groups. jSarek (talk) 08:10, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
4. JangFett ^(Talk) 13:22, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
5. Per precedent at Forum:TC:Non-notable Contispexes and Forum:TC:Non-notable Pius Dea Crusades. Cade Calrayn 15:38, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
6. Why is this a thing 1358 ^(Talk) 16:22, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
7. Winterz (talk) 13:59, January 29, 2014 (UTC)
8. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:03, January 30, 2014 (UTC)
9. KEJ (talk) 21:01, January 30, 2014 (UTC)
10. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 13:32, February 2, 2014 (UTC)
11. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:34, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
12. CC7567 ^(talk) 17:30, February 8, 2014 (UTC)
13. LIGHTNING12345678910 (talk) 01:02, February 10, 2014 (UTC)

Keep all

Discussion

I'm aware that some of these are status articles. That has no bearing on whether they are notable, as notability is not a listed requirement for any status. —MJ— ^{Jedi Council Chambers} 07:11, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

• Such a shame to see this (and after that Shed-Scorcher too). *tear* I propose an alternative to Merge the existing information in these articles to Dilonexa system, to which I would then take to GAN as a replacement for the individual planet articles. -- Riffsyphon1024 09:07, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
  • Information in #1 that was relevant to the system has now been merged to the system article. Keep in mind that the system article will need to include information on #23 as well. —MJ— ^{Training Room} 22:20, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
    • Fair enough. I could have merged it for you too. -- Riffsyphon1024 07:21, January 28, 2014 (UTC)
    • What of the fact that they were also within The Slice? Has something about that changed? NaruHina ^Talk 00:57, February 3, 2014 (UTC)
  • I don't remember if I thanked you for participating in that, Riff. It meant a lot~ :) NaruHina ^Talk 00:57, February 3, 2014 (UTC)

Aww, man! After all of those edits I made? :( - Esjs^(Talk) 16:59, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

• I actually thought that we had gotten rid of these until you started recategorizing them last night. So in a way, you get the credit for bringing them to my attention. :) —MJ— ^{Training Room} 22:20, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

For the record, they were fun~ NaruHina ^Talk 00:50, February 3, 2014 (UTC)