This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Graestan(Talk) 22:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Timeline of films (talk - history - links - logs)
Needless. This information can be found together on multiple pages across the site. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete
- Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 01:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- IFYLOFD (Come with me if you want to live.) 01:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 01:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- This is the kind of baloney I refer to as "Wiki as a Form of Art." Graestan(Talk) 02:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Grunny (Talk) 03:39, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Cylka-talk- 03:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- CC7567
(s)talk 03:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC) - Redundant. -- Riffsyphon1024 07:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Mauser 09:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- As if someone doesn't know I comes before II. —Lucius malfoy7
(Give it up for Lil' 'Soka Tano, ladies and gents!) 23:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC) - Grand Moff Tranner
(Comlink) 23:26, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Chack Jadson (Talk) 23:26, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Unneeded.- Esjs(Talk) 19:22, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Per everyone. Useless. QuiGonJinnThere's always a bigger fish. 19:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Per Toprawa. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Foreshore --Eyrezer 11:07, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Keep
Comments
I happen to think that some of these things we are junking could have usefulness if properly done. Would not that make it easier and more useful to the reader or researcher? Remember, our priority should be to have a wonderful repository of information that the readers and casual fans could easily access and search. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 02:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Why not just make sure that this information is merged into a large list of all Star Wars sources? Why could we not have one master list of all books, films, games, comics, magazines, etc.? We do, hence this TC. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- My apologies for throwing water on your TC-plans. I was unaware of that list's existence. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 15:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's not about throwing water on "my" TC plans, it's about people, and I say this in general, not about you directly, Fiolli, getting unnecessarily defensive that Oh My God, we're deleting articles. Perhaps this is a subjective statement, but I think it's pretty clear most of these things we have been and are "junking" are redundant nonsense articles that would be speedied right off the bat if created today. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- And I will add that it's not as if we're just throwing these articles into the TC process with reckless abandon with no time taken to assess whether some of these are legitimate. More than a few articles that have gone through the process since we started what I will call this "TC wave" have avoided deletion, because people, including myself, do indeed take the time consider an article's worth. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- My apologies for throwing water on your TC-plans. I was unaware of that list's existence. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 15:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)