Forum:TC:Star Wars: Exodus

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Star Wars: Exodus

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Graestan(Talk) 13:12, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Star Wars: Exodus (talk - history - links - logs)

This fan role-playing site doesn't seem to meet the notability requirements. They're a group of disgruntled Star Wars Galaxies fans who started an "exodus" to create their own message board. This message board has never had more than 60 people on at one time, and that was a year and a half ago. On the most "active" thread, the visible posts go back over a month and the bulk of the posts come from only five or six users, indicating a significant lack of traffic. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete as non-notable

  1. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  2. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  3. Pretty much all fansites should be examined with careful scrutiny. We're an encyclopedia, not the Yellow Pages. Graestan(Talk) 21:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  4. Grunny (Talk) 22:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  5. Per Grae. - Lord Hydronium 22:11, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  6. Cylka-talk- 22:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  7. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 22:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  8. Oh lord, bless this rocket house and all who dwell within the rocket house. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 00:45, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
  9. KILL-KILL-KILL Mauser 15:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
  10. DolukFurthermore I believe that lists must be destroyed. 17:38, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
  11. This isn't the Star Wars Fan Crap Spam Wiki. Maybe there should be one of those. Gonk (Gonk!) 12:52, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
  12. Fan sites are never notable. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 13:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
    • If you follow that statement to its logical end, then the Wookieepedia article should also be deleted, since we are a fan site ourselves. However, Wikipedia has an article on us, indicating that they feel we are notable, and since their notability guidelines are more stringent than ours, then it follows that Wookieepedia should be notable enough for an article here, which means that some fan sites are indeed notable. (Did that make any sense?) Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 16:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
  13. Green Tentacle (Talk) 14:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
  14. Per Gonk. Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 16:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Keep

Comments

  • Personally I would prefer us to have articles only about fan-sites, officially acknoledged by some Star Wars WIPs (TheForce.net obviously should stay). Mauser 13:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)