Forum:TC:Planet-name Star Destroyers

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Planet-name Star Destroyers

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Grunny (talk) 00:20, July 14, 2010 (UTC)

Bothawui Star Destroyer (talk - history - links - logs)/Tallaan Star Destroyer (talk - history - links - logs)

For all the reasons of Corellian Star Destroyer. They're just...Star Destroyers made at one planet. Since I didn't remember these in time to put them on the last one before it started, just finishing the job here.

Here's the entire source of these articles, for the record: "Seat of the galactic government since the fall of Coruscant, the water world of Mon Calamari was nimbused with ships of all category and classification, from twenty-year-old scallop-hulled Mon Cal cruisers to gleaming Star Destroyers fresh from the yards of Bothawui and distant Tallaan."

Delete

  1. Lord Hydronium 23:46, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Ugh. More VT-16 nonsense.--Loneshark1138 19:52, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
  3. —Master Jonathan New Jedi Order (Jedi Council Chambers) 00:01, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Menkooroo 00:02, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  5. VT! Chack Jadson (Talk) 00:25, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Soon all of VT's crap will be gone forever. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 00:57, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 02:33, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Let the purge continue. Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 03:34, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  9. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 03:36, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Grunny (talk) 04:40, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  11. !crazylaugh -- 1358 (Talk) 09:02, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  12. --DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 09:05, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  13. NAYAYEN:TALK 11:59, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  14. LtNOWIS 18:45, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
  15. Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:47, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
  16. Imperialles 19:50, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
  17. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 23:26, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
  18. Because Star Destroyers are always built in the same system as the headquarters of their construction company, and subcontracting to other shipyards never ever happens. Uh-huh. jSarek 08:46, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
  19. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 09:08, July 2, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

Kommentare