Forum:TC:Mon Calamari fish

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Mon Calamari fish

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 17:54, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Mon Calamari fish (talk - history - links - logs)

The article essentially is a placeholder for two images that are composed of several smaller images of the generic, background-filling fish. There doesn't seem to be anything unique about the information here that, if such info did exist, couldn't be included in the Dac article. The two images in there probably violate the Image policy too. NAYAYEN:TALK 12:56, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Delete

  1. NAYAYEN:TALK 12:56, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Imperialles 12:57, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
  3. -- 1358 (Talk) 12:58, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
  4. —Master Jonathan New Jedi Order (Jedi Council Chambers) 16:16, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
  5. But how will we know about all the kinds and colors?!?! Dangerdan97 22:24, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
  6. It's a nonarticle. Havac 03:55, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Per Havac. Bella'Mia 04:06, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
  8. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 04:16, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
  9. --DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:20, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:30, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  11. Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 18:50, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  12. And on top of that - On top of that, sir, you are a fish! So sit down and shut up, before I take a harpoon to you! Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 18:52, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  13. Chack Jadson (Talk) 14:40, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  14. This has been here for four years. Four years. How was this not found and given a fiery death before now? And also, per Tranner. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 19:37, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  15. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 19:40, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  16. All kinds! And colors! THIS IS IMPORTANT. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 00:31, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
  17. --Eyrezer 00:49, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
  18. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 00:51, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
  19. There might be room for one of the images in the general fish article. —Silly Dan (talk) 23:50, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Canonical species deserve articles. -LtNOWIS 19:08, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
  2. It reminds me of all the other "extras" that have articles. JangFett (Talk) 00:23, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Discuss

I think that the article about fishes (in general) in a planet wont do, but if someone would go and do articles about the fish species each individually, that would do. Am I right? --Tm T 23:58, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

  • Yes, I think so. "This fish was a creature living on Dac." would be pretty stupid, though. :P -- 1358 (Talk) 05:52, June 14, 2010 (UTC)