Forum:TC:Mission to Coruscant (Kylo Ren)

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Mission to Coruscant (Kylo Ren)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 05:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Mission to Coruscant (Kylo Ren) (history - links - logs - delete - protect)

After the notabilty of the mission was brought up by some members of the EC, some of the board came to the conclusion that the mission was not notable for a page, and so we've decided to put this up for a TC to see what other users of the site think.

The event did not actually happen and was only considered for an earlier version of Episode IX, later being replaced by Kylo Ren going to Exegol. The information present on this page would be better served in the BTS sections of the pages of Coruscant, Jedi Temple, Kylo Ren, and any other relevant ones. Just want to send out a thanks to User:Marvacian Archivist for doing a great job on writing the page, despite this final decision we have come to. Lewisr (talk) 16:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Lewisr (talk) 16:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
  2. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 16:29, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
  3. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 16:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
  4. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 17:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
  5. —spookywillowwtalk 17:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
  6. Bonzane10 Sabine Starbird (holonet) 17:47, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
  7. Fan26 (Talk) 17:08, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
  8. This is essentially an article about a phase in the development process of RoS. I feel like we should only have articles for cut events if they're given names Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:38, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
  9. NBDani TeamFireballLogo-Collider(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 18:11, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
  10. Per AnilSerifoglu's comments below. Asithol (talk) 10:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
    Usually I'd be for retaining articles for full concepts, even if released, but I don't feel like this is the same caliber as other cut content. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 18:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC) my bad already voted
  11. Per Commander CodeThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 12:34, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
  12. Mr Star Wars AminoRepublic (talk) 04:55, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Keep

  1. X9 The Android 16:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
  2. Going to have to side with X9, this is as relevant as any deleted concept, like Red Shoulders or Maul's descendant or anything like that Editoronthewiki (talk) 12:29, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
  3. Per X9 & Ed. - JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 12:55, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
  4. Per above. Rsand 30 (talk) 22:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Comments

  • Non-canonical events still have pages, so having an article for an event that was considered to appear (and has been nominated to highlight) doesn't hurt no one. —Unsigned comment by X9 The Android (talk • contribs)
    • It's a matter of notability, you think it is and that's fine. Just others don't think it is, hence why the vote is happening, so it can be decided Lewisr (talk) 17:29, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
    • The Art of books often include many alternate characters, creatures, locations, and plot ideas that never made it to the final script, and I feel like creating articles for each of them seems excessive. There are tons of stuff in those books that were present in an early draft at some point, like Rey going underwater to reach the Death Star II ruins in TFA (which ended up being used in TROS) and Rose and Finn breaking into a shop in Canto Bight to steal fancy clothes, which don't warrant their own page, imo. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 17:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)