Forum:TC:LS-757

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:LS-757

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 14:12, November 20, 2017 (UTC)

LS-757 (talk - history - links - logs - delete - protect)

There was never a character called LS-757. It was never mentioned in the episode. JS-4422 (talk) 11:39, November 13, 2017 (UTC)

Delete

Keep

  1. 'This is LS-757. We've spotted a rebel in sector 5-1-5'. --Lewisr (talk) 13:27, November 13, 2017 (UTC)
  2. - Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 16:58, November 13, 2017 (UTC)
  3. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:36, November 13, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Brandon Rhea(talk) 05:05, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Imperators II(Talk) 09:08, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
  6. Not sure we even need to vote on this since there's no justification for deleting a canonically named subject, but what the hell. 1358 (Talk) 16:28, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
  7. Keep, but agree with the above also. Obvious non-deletion is obvious. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:16, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
  8. I don't vote often, but I find this kind of bizarre. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:56, November 15, 2017 (UTC)
  9. If no one voted, would this obviously-valid article be deleted anyways? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:49, November 15, 2017 (UTC)
  10. JS-4422's nomination and voting history has been somewhat inscrutable. But more power to those who follow their own path and let no one choose it for them. Asithol (talk) 07:02, November 17, 2017 (UTC)
  11. Sigh. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 13:18, November 17, 2017 (UTC)
  12. JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 13:26, November 17, 2017 (UTC)
  13. Exiled Jedi (talk) 23:02, November 17, 2017 (UTC)
    "This is LS-757...." KEJ (talk) 08:49, November 18, 2017 (UTC) (Vote struck, reason: Per policy: fails to meet productivity requirements -- Imperators II(Talk) 09:08, November 18, 2017 (UTC))

Comments