Forum:TC:Imperial Commerce

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Merge to Imperial Trade and Commerce Authority. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Imperial Commerce (talk - history - links - logs - delete - protect)

The Imperial Trade and Commerce Authority seems to be identical to Imperial Commerce, and the two should be combined.

Merge to Imperial Trade and Commerce Authority

1. SavagePanda845 (Talk) 20:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
2. OOM 224 (he/him) 20:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
3. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
4. Rsand 30 (talk) 22:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
5. —spookywilloww^talk 23:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
6. Bonzane10 (holonet) 23:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
7. Lewisr (talk) 23:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
8. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 00:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
9. Fan26 (Talk) 00:25, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
10. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 10:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
11. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 17:17, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
12. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 17:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
13. Sanathestarr (talk) 10:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Keep

Comments

• While I'm sure this can certainly be decided via a vote (and it has to run its course now), the Trash Compactor is for deciding notability in unclear cases, not page merges. This would usually be facilitated by putting the {{Mergefrom}} and {{Mergeto}} templates on the relevant pages. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 20:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Agreed, this appears to be a clear case where the merge could have gone ahead without the need for a TC to decide its fate. - Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 21:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Thank you, I didn't know about those. SavagePanda845 (Talk) 01:40, 15 March 2024 (UTC)