Forum:TC:Gynt family

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Gynt family

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:03, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

Gynt family (talk - history - links - logs)

We typically don't maintain articles on families where only one member is named. This sets a dangerous precedent, potentially allowing hundreds of pointless "Surname family" articles. Furthermore, the family tree is speculation. --Imperialles 15:01, April 28, 2010 (UTC)¨

Delete

  1. Per nomination reason. --Imperialles 15:01, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  2. A bit silly. Thefourdotelipsis 15:02, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  3. -- 1358 (Talk) 15:14, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  4. If he gets some relations then yes, keep it, but for now, delete. Nayayen—TALK 15:44, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Kill with fire! Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 16:28, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Per Nayayen. Jonjedigrandmaster Jedi symbol (We seed the stars) 18:35, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 19:30, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  8. —fodigg BlackRebelStarbird (talk) | 19:40, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  9. As long as the whole "fourth generation" thing is mentioned in the Gynt's article, then delete. Dr. Kermit(Complain.) 20:02, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Per Xicer. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 22:36, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  11. Chack Jadson (Talk) 00:49, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
  12. I almost said CSD, but then I saw what you did there. Precedent! -- Darth Culator (Talk) 01:28, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
  13. Grunny (talk) 20:27, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
  14. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 11:59, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
  15. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 22:12, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
  16. Green Tentacle (Talk) 22:25, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
  17. I'm also interested if there are other such articles. Pranay Sobusk ~ Talk 15:53, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
  18. Kill kill kill. Graestan(Talk) 18:19, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. While only one family member is named, the family itself is outright mentioned in the transcript: Eison Gynt was a fourth generation Jedi —and was important to establish a connection between Gynt and Ovair: Having a similar heritage, the venerated Jedi Scholar, Master Barel Ovair, took Gynt as his apprentice. While I understand there's the concern of somebody creating a family article for every character, this instance comes from specific mention of a "family line" in source material. —fodigg BlackRebelStarbird (talk) | 15:17, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
    • The family isn't mentioned at all, merely hinted at. To presume to know that "fourth generation" refers to a specific family unit is speculation. --Imperialles 15:24, April 28, 2010 (UTC)