Forum:TC:Goravvus's airspeeder

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Goravvus's airspeeder

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Graestan(Talk) 22:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Goravvus's airspeeder (talk - history - links - logs)

We already have an article for this particular type of airspeeder, PL-90 Luxury Speeder.

Delete

  1. Ajeanette 03:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Keep

  1. So by that logic, because we have an article about the YT-1300 light freighter we don't need to keep the Millennium Falcon? It's canon, it's a specific speeder, it should stay. Wildyoda 04:57, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  2. Per Wildyoda. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 05:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  3. Goravvus's airspeeder is not a PL-90. There are several visible physical differences. The undercarriage shape looks completely different, for one. The PL-90 is also taller in height, shorter in length, and completely without headlights, for another. SinisterSamurai 05:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  4. Per Wildyoda and Samurai. We need to start creating conjecture articles more though, simply because everything IU is notable on this wiki. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 08:37, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  5. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  6. Technically, if an artist draws 50 speeders in a scene, we could create a canonical article about each one. Mauser 02:41, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  7. Per SinisterSamurai. I'm not convinced Goravvus's airspeeder is a PL-90. But I would not argue that every individual speeder is inherently notable, any more than any individual hand cart is inherently notable. I believe every make and model of aspeeder is notable, including conjectural ones. The same is true for other types of vehicles. But I do not believe we need a dozen conjectural articles for [[:File:Troopers2-6.jpg|this image]], for example. -LtNOWIS 05:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  8. Only because it's not a PL-90. If it was, I'd say delete most coitenly. Thefourdotelipsis 00:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
  9. I don't think it's a PL-90. DolukTalk 03:30, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
  10. Speedy keep this. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 16:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  11. Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  12. Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 09:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  13. And the dozens of chaaracter specific weapons articles Cylka and I have made are what exactly? NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 19:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments