This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep but expand.—Silly Dan (talk) 00:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Fungus (talk - history - links - logs)
Same thing as its real-world equivalent. Useless article. Wildyoda 20:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but expand. While it currently lacks any GFFA-relevant info, I know there IS GFFA specific info to be added (compare to the VFD for Lichen). jSarek 03:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, I agree with jSarek this needs to be expanded not deleted. --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 08:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep–but only if there's more GFFA specific stuff to add. Green Tentacle (Talk) 08:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- I think the Lichen page survives simply because of the Yuuzhan Vong glow lichen being relatively notable. I'll change my vote to keep if someone can make an intelligent article (even a short article) that is something more than a list of Star Wars fungi. Wildyoda 18:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)