Forum:TC:Culture of Naboo

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Culture of Naboo
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was merge to appropriate articles.
Master JonathanCouncil Chambers
00:06 UTC MonMay 26, 2014

Culture of Naboo (history - links - logs - delete - protect)

This does not in any way disparage the work Stake's done here, but there's absolutely no reason this information belongs in a separate article. it should be split between the Naboo (people) and Gungan articles, and some of it copied to the appropriate sections of the Naboo planet article.

Merge

  1. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 15:00, May 8, 2014 (UTC)
  2. I don't really see any reason that this should have its own article.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 15:33, May 8, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Ridiculous. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:37, May 8, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Trip391 (talk) 20:55, May 8, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Not ridiculous at all — more interesting and informative than a lot of status articles. Its only problem is that the stray Gungan culture stuff doesn't fit well into the article, because the planet Naboo didn't really have a very tightly integrated culture or political system. I think 90-95% of the article should be put into the Naboo (people) article, the culture of whom most of the text discusses. —Silly Dan (talk) 23:49, May 8, 2014 (UTC)
    • It is ridiculous that this should ever be entertained as a separate article. The content itself is fine and, as Cade and you have suggested, rightfully belongs in the Naboo (people) article. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:57, May 8, 2014 (UTC)
  6. Indeed. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 02:32, May 9, 2014 (UTC)
  7. Belongs in the Naboo article. Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:40, May 9, 2014 (UTC)
  8. Stake did a lot of good work on this, but it doesn't deserve its own article. IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 05:16, May 9, 2014 (UTC)
  9. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:24, May 9, 2014 (UTC)
  10. Per Floyd. 1358 (Talk) 21:56, May 9, 2014 (UTC)
  11. Clone Commander Lee Talk 22:00, May 9, 2014 (UTC)
  12. WESA NO LIKE DA NABOO. DA NABOO TINK DAY SO SMARTY. DAY TINK DAY BRAINS SO BIG! -- Darth Culator (Talk) 16:10, May 11, 2014 (UTC)
  13. Nice job, Stake, but yes to Naboo (people). -- Riffsyphon1024 16:30, May 11, 2014 (UTC)
  14. From what i can see, most of it would go in the aforementioned Naboo (people) article (most of the arts/literature/music etc) with other parts going into the Naboo article (historical mentions for example, and how these shaped local custom and philosophy). Other places would get brief mentions elsewhere (Padme and several other articles should have the mention of lack of medical reports due to cultural reasons). Manoof (talk) 02:20, May 14, 2014 (UTC)
  15. Per Cade.
    Master JonathanCouncil Chambers
    15:08 UTC WedMay 14, 2014
  16. Winterz (talk) 12:17, May 17, 2014 (UTC)
  17. LIGHTNING12345678910 (talk) 12:41, May 17, 2014 (UTC)
  18. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 06:26, May 18, 2014 (UTC)
  19. Green Tentacle (Talk) 11:06, May 18, 2014 (UTC)

Keep

  1. We don't usually have articles on specific themes like culture because there usually isn't enough information to fill an article on it. On Naboo, there is a ludicrous amount of information related to culture. I feel this has the right to stay, as much as Padmé Amidala's wardrobe, which is another unorthodox article that earned its keep. Stake black msg 15:04, May 8, 2014 (UTC)
    • All of this article, from what i could see, would go in the above mentioned articles. To have it in one place IMO serves no purpose, as the majority of it would be in the Naboo (people) article with other tidbits elsewhere. Amidala's wardrobe on the other hand is too large to fit in another article, was specically mentioned by actors (Carrie) and was notable outside of the usual Star Wars, or even Sci-fi, fanbase (it featured in Vogue magazine). By that last part alone i think it would deserve an article. Manoof (talk) 02:20, May 14, 2014 (UTC)

Discussion