Forums > Consensus track archive > CT:Votes for deletion revamp
This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus Track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was to restructure WP:VFD into a forum format.–SentryTalk 21:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
JSarek recently proposed reworking the Votes for deletion page and restructuring it using a forum format. Below is the proposal that I came up with (see Forum:Category for vfd):
| View recent changes | <createbox>
editintro=Template:VFD editintro break=no prefix=Wookieepedia:Votes_for_deletion/ preload=Template:VFD preload buttonlabel=Add new VFD </createbox> |
| Page | Last Edit | Last Contributor |
|---|
–SentryTalk 03:13, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Vote
Keep the VFD page how it is
Change over to a forum format
- SentryTalk 03:13, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Atarumaster88
(Audience Chamber) 03:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Lord OblivionSith holocron
03:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Support. Shock for everyone, I'm sure. ;-) jSarek 03:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Imp 09:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- I need a name (Complain here) 14:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- This looks easier. Fnlayson 18:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know what the other one was but this looks really easy enough. Jorrel Fraajic 18:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sure why not. -- Riffsyphon1024 18:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Havac 22:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yoshi626 01:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- —Silly Dan (talk) 13:02, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- - breathesgelatinTalk 02:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- I guess there's no turning back now. -- Riffsyphon1024 03:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- After giving this a little thought, I am a little uneasy about the "Add new VFD" button. As an alternative, I think that it might be better to make some changes to the {{vfd}} template and make it the primary way to create a VFD page. Using the {{#ifexist:}} parser function, I can modify it to include page creation instructions only if a VFD subpage has not yet been created. That way, we can make sure that the relevant article/page has been correctly VFD tagged wile also ensuring that the VFD page is correctly named. Thoughts?–SentryTalk 23:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- That does sound like a better idea. -- Ozzel 01:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- That does sound like a better idea. -- Ozzel 01:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- After giving this a little thought, I am a little uneasy about the "Add new VFD" button. As an alternative, I think that it might be better to make some changes to the {{vfd}} template and make it the primary way to create a VFD page. Using the {{#ifexist:}} parser function, I can modify it to include page creation instructions only if a VFD subpage has not yet been created. That way, we can make sure that the relevant article/page has been correctly VFD tagged wile also ensuring that the VFD page is correctly named. Thoughts?–SentryTalk 23:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
| [[File:Palpatine-hd.jpg|100px]] | And now, young Skywalker... you will die. This article is nominated for termination in accordance with Wookieepedia's deletion policy. Please see this article's entry on the votes for deletion page for voting and discussion on the matter. Do not remove this tag until voting is complete. |
| Warning: This VFD is incomplete. In order to complete the "Votes for deletion" process, please create a VFD discussion page so that the community can decide this page's fate. Otherwise, this message will be removed. |
- How does that look?–SentryTalk 08:02, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Good. Will the 'create a VFD discussion page' link show up like a regular link if that page exists? -Fnlayson 17:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- If the page exists, the template will render exactly like it does now and the second box will not appear at all. The text "this article's entry" will be turned into a link to the VFD page.–SentryTalk 22:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. That's even nicer. I was thinking a simple hyperlink/redlink thing. -Fnlayson 04:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- If the page exists, the template will render exactly like it does now and the second box will not appear at all. The text "this article's entry" will be turned into a link to the VFD page.–SentryTalk 22:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Good. Will the 'create a VFD discussion page' link show up like a regular link if that page exists? -Fnlayson 17:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Can we implement this? Havac 20:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.