Forum:CT:Vehicle infobox templates

Forums > Consensus track archive > CT:Vehicle infobox templates
This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Support proposal. Imperators II(Talk) 07:12, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
  1. For templates in Category:Vehicle infobox templates, make |designer= go before |manufacturer=.
  2. Add the |designer= field for those infoboxes which lack it.

Senate Hall thread here. Loqiical (talk) 08:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

  1. Loqiical (talk) 08:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. Imperators II(Talk) 08:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
  3. Rsand 30 (talk) 12:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
  4. Fan26 (Talk) 14:22, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
  5. NanoLuukeCloning Facility 14:26, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
  6. Lewisr (talk) 22:47, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
  7. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 22:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
  8. CT-1742 Clone Army patch (talk) 22:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
  9. —spookywillowwtalk 17:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
  10. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 21:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

Discuss

  • Perhaps a bot operator can pre-emptively tell us whether it would be possible to automate the swapping in point 1 - the main issue imo being that sometimes it involves the swapping of corresponding references, as well, with respect to our rule that a reference's full text is to be provided upon its first instance. Imperators II(Talk) 08:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
    • All things are possible through the power of regex, my friend. Do not fear the dark sorcery. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 13:37, 23 April 2023 (UTC)