Forum:CT:Death daggers

Forums > Consensus track archive > CT:Death daggers
This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus Track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Oppose proposal. 1358 (Talk) 13:25, July 4, 2020 (UTC)

Per a discussion in the Senate Hall, myself and several others have come to the agreement that † should only be used for the individuals and/or droids that died in battle and organizations like the Separatist Alliance during the mission to Mustafar or the Jakku Imperial remnant during the Battle of Jakku.

However, if there were no individuals listed in the casualties, like clone troopers or battle droids, then the death dagger can be used on any vehicles that were destroyed. CIS roundel Erebus Chronus Open frequency 18:53, June 19, 2020 (UTC)

Support

  1. CIS roundel Erebus Chronus Open frequency 18:53, June 19, 2020 (UTC)
  2. Sounds good to me. Braha'tok enthusiast (Hello there) 19:03, June 19, 2020 (UTC)
  3. --Lewisr (talk) 19:15, June 19, 2020 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Confusingly worded, lacks any actual language to be added to policy pages, and if I am interpreting it correctly, I wouldn't agree with it anyway. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 23:21, June 19, 2020 (UTC)
  2. Couldn't agree more with Culator. I know I throw around the word "arbitrary" a lot (and not without good reason), but this is pretty arbitrary. Don't use daggers for starships, except when there are no characters, then use them for starships. Poor idea. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 07:50, June 20, 2020 (UTC)
  3. Per Culator and Toprawa--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:00, June 20, 2020 (UTC)
  4. Got to agree with the above. I'm not against making a policy for this, but a lack of formal language to be made policy, vague wording, and a route I don't even agree with make this a full oppose for me. Tommy-Macaroni 08:58, June 20, 2020 (UTC)
  5. Per above. - - -CIS roundel OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 09:11, June 20, 2020 (UTC)
  6. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:07, June 20, 2020 (UTC)
  7. I don't even know what's happening here, which makes it bad policy. MasterCommerce GuildFredcerique 18:41, June 20, 2020 (UTC)
  8. JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 18:51, June 20, 2020 (UTC)
  9. Per Tommy. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 21:03, June 20, 2020 (UTC)
  10. It's confusing, and I wouldn't necessarily be against this, but I also don't really see this as an issue as well.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 05:20, June 22, 2020 (UTC)
  11. AV-6R7Crew Pit 05:35, June 22, 2020 (UTC)
  12. No concrete proposal has been presented. 1358 (Talk) 20:29, June 22, 2020 (UTC)
  13. I arbitrarily agree with Tope's "arbitrary" point. Pick one rule and stick with it. Asithol (talk) 06:24, June 23, 2020 (UTC)
  14. Per Fred. Fan26 (Talk) 13:46, July 2, 2020 (UTC)

Comments

  • Would "individuals" include named pets, for example Pateesa with respect to the infobox of Rescue of Han Solo? And would "vehicles" only be limited to named/specific vehicles or could the dagger be used with unnamed vehicles of a given model? Imperators II(Talk) 20:33, June 19, 2020 (UTC)
    • Forgot to include that in the description above, but yes, pets and creatures that were killed, like Pateesa and the arena beasts in the infobox on First Battle of Geonosis and only named vehicles/starships that were destroyed would use the dagger, like the Executor. CIS roundel Erebus Chronus Open frequency 20:40, June 19, 2020 (UTC)