Forum:CT:Adopt vandalism policy

Forums > Consensus track archive > CT:Adopt vandalism policy

This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus Track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record. The result was adopt policy. —Silly Dan (talk) 21:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

A recent post on Wookieepedia talk:Vandalism points out Wookieepedia:Vandalism is still marked as a proposed policy. Let's remove that "proposed" part. —Silly Dan (talk) 21:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Adopt policy

  1. It's a common-sense definition of the term. —Silly Dan (talk) 21:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
  2. ...this wasn't a policy before? Whoops. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 00:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  3. Good catch, Dan. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  4. I think that maybe, just maybe, this policy has had enough time to be adopted. ;-p jSarek 00:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  5. Wow. I can't believe this wasn't noticed before. DarthDragon164Blackdragontalk!Blackdragon164 00:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  6. Boil all vandals alive. Then go look at the Encyclopedia Dramatica page they make on how we boil them alive. Graestan(Talk) 02:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  7. SFH 02:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  8. --Eyrezer 02:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  9. Chack Jadson (Talk) 12:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  10. Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 12:05, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  11. Yes. -- I need a name (Complain here) 13:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  12. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:14, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
  13. Per jSarek and Grae. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 15:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
  14. DUH. Unit 8311 17:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
  15. After much consideration... ;) —Xwing328(Talk) 02:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
  16. Greyman@wikia(Talk) 03:16, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
  17. Ozzel 12:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
  18. I may just concur with this idea. Darth Xadún(Consult the Holocron) 12:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
  19. Imperialles 13:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
  20. Yup. KEJ 12:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
  21. Per all of the above. MadclawShyriiwook! 16:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Keep policy as "proposed" pending improvements

Comments

  • Just as a qualifier, any chance we can sneak an April Fool's Day qualifier in there somewhere? I'm specifically referring to 2007's April Fool's Day, where the administration came up with some funny (yet descriptive and completely relevant to the topic) names and moved the pages accordingly? JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 00:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
    • I think that's an exception to the rule that it would be best not to publicize during the other 364 days of the year. ;-) jSarek 00:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
      • Meh. I just wanted to know it'd be safe :P JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 01:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
        • A well-executed joke on April 1 is a good faith attempt to improve the wiki, though. 8) —Silly Dan (talk) 00:15, 23 May 2008 (UTC)