Wookieepedia:Wookieepedian of the Month/May 2007

< Wookieepedia:Wookieepedian of the Month

Nominations for May, 2007

JMAS

Support

  1. ATATatarismall.png 20:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 09:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Redemption

Support

  1. .... 21:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. Cull Tremayne 22:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
    • He made my search box dream come true - Total WOTM!! - Jinko 23:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC) The reason still stands and you still rock but had to change for someone else. You're up next month, totally. - Jinko 23:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Too controversial. Quite rude. Darth Maddolis 04:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. --Shaelas(HoloConference)CzerkaCorporationLogo-KOTOR 14:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. Has absolutely appropriate views about Fanon. -- Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 22:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. I dunno about rudeness, but he has a gift for screencapping Enochf 23:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. Just controversial enough. XP--Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 02:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Objections

  1. Too controversial. Quite rude. Chack Jadson 00:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Corrected me (see below). Darth Maddolis 04:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Too rude and curses.And I don't care how much he has done for this wiki. Troyb 23:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. Humbone 10:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. He's been banned 3 times!--Windu223 23:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Actually four. *smirk* --RedemptionRedemptionusersymbolTalk 23:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
      • Or maybe...maybe it is you who have been banned 3 times! and you just do not know it yet. Thefourdotelipsis 01:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. Sorry, but no. supergeeky1 BobaFett The Cantina 21:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
  7. Purposefully violates civility guidelines repeatedly after warnings, and we want him as a shining example of Wookieepedian-ness? Nuh uh. Atarumaster88 03:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Comments

  • Sure, Redemption might be controversial, and he might fly in the face of Civility and NPA, but so what? All of those people had it coming to them. If not from Redemption, then from me, or maybe even an admin's perma-ban-stick. But what Redemption does do well is images. Sometimes his critical faculty on the contents of the images may be fractured, but hey – that's better than a good image with shithouse resolution, eh? So whilst Redemption may have the exterior of a cold, hard, and ruthless person, inside, I believe, beats the heart of a...well, to be honest, the heart of a cold, hard, and efficient user. But at least he contributes. Contributes good. .... 21:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Contributes *well*, fourdot. Just because you won Wookieepedian of the month for this month, it doesn't mean your grammar can go out of hand :P Darth Maddolis 12:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Enochf

Support

  1. Same reasons as last month. <span="color:red">TheNewDarthMalevlent(The Sith shall rise to power!) 00:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Gonk (Gonk!) 14:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Of these other guys, Enochf gets my vote. - JMAS 19:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. Big time. Darth Maddolis 04:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. Keeping track of the QOTD is hard work. —Silly Dan (talk) 13:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. Havac 05:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  7. Azizlight 08:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  8. Darth Ocean 13.05, 13 April 2007 (GMT)
  9. Green Tentacle (Talk) 12:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  10. I must go through with my promise. Jorrel Wiki-shrinkable Fraajic 23:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  11. Good user, this... uh... creature! Jedipilot94 01:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  12. School of Thrawn 101 10:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  13. Chack Jadson 18:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  14. Darth Nospher 15:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)It was hard to choose between Enochf and Kuraliov, they both deserved it !
  15. Mrobviousjosh 02:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC) I'm new but so far I've SEEN how much Enochf does around here, especially with my articles, lol. Things ranging from double checking sources, improving writing, and obtaining new images. He works hard and I think the award is well deserved.
  16. supergeeky1 BobaFett The Cantina 03:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

  • JMAS, you voted for someone else? Oh, wait, can you vote for yourself? I mean, nothing to be selfish, but on natural instincts, I would've voted for myself. TheNewDarthMalevlent(The Sith shall rise to power!) 23:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
    • You can't vote or nominate for yourself. —Silly Dan (talk) 13:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
      • Yeah, what Silly Dan said. *L* And as such, I looked at the other nominees and voted for who I would have voted for of these other potentials was I not in the running. Which I'm not, as far as I'm concerned ... or my vote is concerned anyway. ;) - JMAS 13:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Enochf takes my vote next month unless someone else very good comes up, but Kuralyov has so many edits that it's not even funny.Hobbes15(Tiger Headquarters) 18:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Solus

Support

  1. Great work improving articles reviewed by the Inq. - Sikon 00:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. LtNOWIS 08:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Darthchristian (Hey!) 16:20 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

  1. I'm a WOTM nom? ……It can't be true, it's impossible! -Solus (Bird of Prey) 12:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Kuralyov

Support

  1. --Eyrezer 03:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Volemlock 20:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. TopAce 09:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 04:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. Adamwankenobi 04:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. Yoshi626 04:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  7. Bly1993 19:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  8. Most edits of all Wookieepedians, and without a bot. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  9. Worthy of the title, methinks. Not to say that the other's aren't but I think this'un should get it. - Jinko 23:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  10. I've never seen this many edits- and most of them are on articles, not talk pages. Definitely deserves to be WOTM.Hobbes15(Tiger Headquarters) 17:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  11. Ozzel 05:37, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  12. Greyman(Paratus) 21:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  13. —Xwing328(Talk) 18:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
  14. Sikon 08:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

  • Considering Kuralyov has never been WOTM, I have to give my vote to him. Despite any tounge-in-cheek comments about botism, Kuralyov is a huge player here at the Wookieepedia. --Eyrezer 03:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
    • I have the same thoughts too. And can somebody please nominate me?!?! Bly1993

Stake black

Support

  1. I support Stake Black to be wookieepedian of the month. He has made 1,744 edits. He's a good advice giver, helper and more. He's even gave me some good advice also. He's currently the stripper. Please vote for Stake Black. --Windu223 13:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Objections

  1. ~1,800 edits aren't so many, especially considering he's been a member for more than a year. - TopAce (Talk) 19:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
    • They're still a lot, maybe not in comparison to others, but considering he hasn't been WOTM before. All the better for him, it just means out of the year, he's wasted less time, probably. Darth Maddolis 08:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Editing doesn't make you WOTM. Editing well does. Havac 22:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Not bad, but not good enough in comparison to the other noms.Hobbes15(Tiger Headquarters) 23:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

  • The stripper? Chack Jadson 01:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
    • That's what it says on Stake's user page. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
      • A thousand edits? Well blow me down! Cull Tremayne 07:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
      • Actually, one thousand seven hundred forty four edits to be exact.--Windu223 13:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)