A fresh new face on the GAN page, who's been working hard on promoting musical scalefish to status and who is always very polite and good-natured while responding to objections. He's also been doing good work outside of the GAN page, particularly on updating various pages in response to official Episode VII announcements. This up-and-comer will be a good addition to our WOTM history. Also he made the site. Menkooroo (talk) 09:55, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
I'm voting for his work in the early years which was of significant relevance and he should've earned one WOTM back then.Winterz (talk) 11:59, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
After Cav's recent second WOTM, I believe that we should continue this trend of giving these awards to Wookieepedians who have clearly earned it. Xd highly deserves this award because of his sincere passion and love for the Wook. If you ever want to look at a diplomatic, kind, and well mannered man, it's Xd. I've known Xd for nearly five years now and I consider him to be a great pal and fellow Wookieepedian. JangFett(Talk) 18:59, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
After more thought, I can't abide someone who doesn't defend the Wook when it's under attack like Riff did on Twitter lately. Plus, I <3 ecks. OLIOSTER(talk) 19:09, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
Yeah ecks has been working a lot recently and his whole IRC tutorials kind of make it worth my change of votes. I still don't like this guy though.. Winterz (talk) 19:13, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
I vote for ecks due to his noble sacrifice of sleep for the EduCorps meetings...--Exiled Jedi(Greetings) 19:26, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
Close, Oli, but more accurate would be "someone who sympathizes with and appeases the attackers in a transparent and desperate attempt to stay relevant." I'd rather vote for someone who actually is relevant beyond a figurehead title. -- Darth Culator(Talk) 20:01, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
I have "encountered" the ecks more than Riff, so I'm going to vote for him this month. Also, per EJ. 501stdogma(talk) 20:21, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
I really like this trend of double-WOTM awards. In other news: Ecks is awesome. Seriously. He's a guy who tends to stay in the background where there isn't much attention, but I know from personal experience that he is one of the great moving forces behind this wiki. He's a great contributor, a wonderful admin, a brilliant techy guy, and a good friend. Go ecks.—Cal Jedi(Personal Comm Channel) 02:27, May 3, 2014 (UTC)
Definitely. ecks is around literally every single day. I haven't once seen him even argue with users on here, and as EJ said, every time we have an EC meeting, he logs it all for us. Per all above, Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:07, May 3, 2014 (UTC)
Some of the above support comments remind me of our April Fools WOTM page. QuiGonJinn(Talk) 14:58, May 3, 2014 (UTC)
Nom accepted via IRC about a month ago JangFett(Talk) 18:59, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
wut is this i dun even 1358(Talk) 19:01, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
For the record, this WOTM is unnecessary. I did not accept a nomination nor was made aware of it until recently. I do not require the additional recognition, though the thought is appreciated. In regards to comments, I hope you understand that I was keeping with the best interests of the wiki by defusing the situation. That is all I will say about it here. -- Riffsyphon1024 02:41, May 5, 2014 (UTC)
OLIOSTER (talk) 19:09, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
(Greetings) 19:26, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
