Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Template:Sith Triumvirate

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete - Sikon 19:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC). I don't see why this template is needed. Navigation templates are meant to tie together collections of similar articles in order to improve site navigation, but this one does not do that. It just lists a bunch of articles that are only vaguely tied to a certain topic, in this case, the 'so called' Sith Triumvirate. Half of the listed articles can be associated with other groups.

I think it sets a bad precedent to start creating such navigation templates. What are we going to have next, a Wookiee navigation template that lists all the wookiees and every article associated with them? A navigation template that lists ship classes by creator, the Star Wars films, or the books in a series are all logical and easy to understand collections, but this template is very abstractly designed. I cannot think of any fitting place for it except for the actual Sith Triumvirate article. As such, we don't really need a template at all — the information can just be integrated into the text body of that article.–SentryTalk 23:53, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

  • 1 Template:Sith Triumvirate
    • 1.1 Keep
    • 1.2 Delete
    • 1.3 Comments

Template:Sith Triumvirate

{{Sith Triumvirate}}

Keep

Delete

  1. Merge info into Sith Triumvirate and delete –SentryTalk 23:53, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  2. Just put it in the article. We have a lot of these. Several are unnecessary. Chack Jadson 00:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  3. Pointless. (And "Elite Sith Assassin" is gameplay mechanics anyway.) - Sikon 08:07, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  4. Useless. - breathesgelatinTalk 02:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  5. Imp 13:54, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  6. --Eyrezer 22:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments