This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete - Sikon 06:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC).
Contents
Sexual stereotyping (talk - history - links - logs)
Unsourced, original research and POV. - Sikon 04:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep
Merge
Redirect
Delete
- Sikon 04:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- [Redacted by administration] Karohalva 04:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- [Redacted by administration] --Redemption
Talk 04:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC) - Has seven {{fact}} templates. --Yoshi626 04:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Havac 05:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Green Tentacle (Talk) 10:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- True though. .... 10:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Beat with the Delete stick, per Sikon. [Redacted by administration] jSarek 10:06, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Many sources say this should be deleted. [citation needed] - Lord Hydronium 10:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- LOL @ Hydronium. And I vote to delete not because it's an invalid argument, but because it seems to be a pretty insignificant argument—thus unsourceable. SW is far from the worst franchise in this regard. Gonk 13:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Darth Nospher 21:58, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- [Redacted by administration]--Valin Kenobi 05:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm a female SW fan and I can see no real use for this article being on it's own. At best it should be included in a larger article. --Katana Geldar 05:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Comments
I planned to make some changes to it today, but now that it's going to be deleted, I guess it's of no use. - TopAce 13:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)