Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Nostril of Palpatine

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge with Superweapon. --Imp ATATatarismall.png 20:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Nostril of Palpatine (talk - history - links - logs)

The main problem is, there is no such thing. - Sikon 04:19, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Extreme keep. Otherwise there will be edit wars to keep the quote and the nostril pic on the Superweapon article. -- Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 11:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Fanboyistic keep. KEJ 11:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Hooray hyperinclusionism! Wildyoda 18:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. It's a canonical reference. Of some sort. And it has a picture of Palpatine's nostril. Havac 23:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. Funny jokey Enochf 09:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. jSarek 02:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  7. I need a name (Complain here) 21:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  8. Please don't ruin the Superweapons page with this... Evir Daal 07:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
  9. I was considering that this and Captain Obvious might be filed under a "witty quotes" article or something, but this is fine right here. - Esjs 08:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
  10. lolololzZ!1--Valin Kenobi 19:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Merge

  1. Superweapons. Make a "Hypothetical Superweapons" section. .... 04:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Agree to merge into section but we gotta keep the quote. -- Riffsyphon1024 05:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Worth mentioning in the Superweapons article, but that's about it. --Azizlight 11:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. Yesc Bonko 19:15, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. Ditto Riffsyphon. - JMAS 19:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. Per 4dot. Gonk (Gonk!) 22:19, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  7. Per Thefourdotelipsis. --FireV 23:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  8. Per Riff. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  9. LtNOWIS 09:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  10. StarNeptuneTalk to me! 09:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  11. An article about something Han said? Hilariousness aside, this is idiotic. Cull Tremayne 09:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  12. Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 09:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  13. —Silly Dan (talk) 21:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  14. It's worth finding a place to put the quote- the picture is unnecessary but kind of funny. Not enough for it's own article though.Mrobviousjosh 03:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  15. Ditto Thefourdotelipsis. But for the sake of Yoda, get rid of the picture. *headdesks* Wynaut 18:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  16. Ugh. Stake black msg 22:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  17. —Xwing328(Talk) 01:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Redirect

Delete

  1. Imp ATATatarismall.png 13:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Nostril of Palpitine? This wiki doesn't need this. Delete.--Windu223 14:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Delete. NoP does not deserve a page any more than "Galaxy Destructor" does. -Fnlayson 13:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. Kuralyov 23:35, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

It is an amazing quote, after all. --School of Thrawn 101 11:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

  • A humorous quote does not by itself warrant an article on a nonexistent superweapon. - Sikon 12:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Thus the reasoning for my edit residing in the "Comments" section. --School of Thrawn 101 12:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • The Nova Colossus and Galaxy Destructor articles are vertually identical. I suggest we merge all three of them under a section in superweapons. Bonko 19:19, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Aside from the other two "superweapons", is there any precedent here for an article detailing something that doesn't actually exist? I'd love to keep this, but it doesn't seem defensible purely because it's amusing. CooperTFN 09:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Bimkall Sector and Super-class Star Destroyer (Fleet Junkies, shut up). Still not an excuse to keep this. - Sikon 09:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
      • Also, Sab Rufo's existence is questionable. —Silly Dan (talk) 21:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
        • Don't forget the gravitic superweapon Kyp Durron claimed the Yuuzhan Vong were building in the wreckage of Sernpidal; officially, that didn't exist either.
          • No, we won't forget it, because it was a major NR focus for a while. Nostril of Palpatine, not so. .... 07:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)