Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Kuat battlecruiser

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge into Kuat Drive Yards and delete. - Sikon 20:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC).

Kuat battlecruiser

Keep

  1. Kuralyov 08:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 23:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Delete

#See comment below.--Valin Kenobi 07:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

#Delete. As ships such as Imperial-class Star Destroyers and Executor-class Star Dreadnoughts have been described in sources as "battlecruisers" before, there's no reason to think that the term was used to refer to an unknown type of ship here unless the text indicates otherwise. jSarek 09:23, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Merge & Delete

  1. Merge into Kuat Drive Yards and delete. - Lord Hydronium 09:29, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Darth Abeonis Sith Council (Sith Campaign) 09:32, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. SentryTalk 09:38, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. Merge with Kuat Drive Yards and Delete. Existing ships have been described as "battlecruisers" before, so there's no reason to think that these are new, but the logistical information about the yards is useful for that article. jSarek 09:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. Cutch 13:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  6. Merge with Star Battlecruiser if you must. VT-16 10:59, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  7. Changing to Merge & Delete since I'll agree with jSarek that the yards information has some value.Valin Kenobi 07:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  8. Malak501 05:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  9. Merge with Kuat drive Yards. Bonko 15:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  10. Riffsyphon1024 05:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  11. Yoshi626 01:13, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments

This is just so random. It's so nonspecific as to be nearly useless, and the BTS conjecture is very nearly as long as the article proper. In the absence of specific information about an actual class of vessel, I say delete.--Valin Kenobi 07:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Uhm...can't we assume that these are Star Destroyers? .... 09:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
    • No, we can't. They might be Star Dreadnoughts or Star Battlecruisers, or perhaps they are indeed plain old battlecruisers. We really know nothing about these ships. jSarek 09:40, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • They are mentioned throughout the The Bounty Hunter Wars trilogy, alongside Kuat-made destroyers and cruisers, being built for the Empire. I guess if we agree upon it, we can just merge them with the Star Battlecruiser article as well as merging Kuati cruiser with the Star Cruiser article, since it's pretty clear all these types mentioned are Imperial Star Destroyers, Star Cruisers and Star Battlecruisers. VT-16 10:59, 5 November 2006 (UTC)