Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Jedi Knight Order

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Silly Dan (talk) 03:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

  • 1 Jedi Knight Order
    • 1.1 Delete
    • 1.2 Keep
    • 1.3 Comments

Jedi Knight Order

We still don't have criteria for which fansites stay and which go. Is a gaming clan over a year old notable?

Delete

  1. —Silly Dan (talk) 03:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  2. This "non-notable" has a HUGE "NON". - Sikon [Talk] 04:48, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  3. LtNOWIS 04:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  4. SFH 05:00, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  5. Mithridates 05:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  6. We can't have everything lying around here. Charlii 09:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  7. I don't feel it contributes anything to the wiki. - Angel Blue 451 15:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  8. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 15:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Keep

Comments

Precedents for deleting or keeping this sort of site:

  • Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Open Jedi Project: we kept a game mod's page
  • Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/CreatureCantina.com: we couldn't decide with a fansite's article
  • Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Shadowscourge: we deleted a page on a message board
  • Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Star Wars Rebuilding of Empires on Spacebattles.com: we decided a single thread on a non-Star Wars message board wasn't worth keeping
  • Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Star Wars Role Play Central: we decided to delete a gaming board's article
  • Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Border-Legion: we deleted an article on a group of Galaxies players, more because it was masquerading as canon than anything else
  • Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/RPG World ended in no consensus, but was later deleted with a 2-1 vote vote. —Silly Dan (talk) 03:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

OK, the community has spoken. Will this added precedent help lead to a policy? —Silly Dan (talk) 03:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)