Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Energy

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete - Sikon 12:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC).

Energy

Keep

Delete

  1. DarthMRN 18:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. It has been sourceless since December 2, 2005. –SentryTalk 18:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Blow this thing. Fnlayson 20:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. (Fires proton torpedoes into article)--Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 20:59, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. - breathesgelatinTalk 05:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  6. Ozzel 05:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  7. Delete. We may also want to look at ray. jSarek 09:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  8. Remove. Unnecessary, pointless, unsourced, and POV. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 07:27, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  9. Jasca Ducato 22:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  10. Yoshi626 22:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Comments

Sourceless and stupid-sounding. Unless this vote attracts someone who knows a source for this thing, it should be sabered off of Wookieepedia.DarthMRN 18:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Any particular reason my name is lined out? Can the vote starter not participate in the vote?DarthMRN 23:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Havac struck out your vote because you did not include a timestamp which, technically, makes it invalid. Since you did timestamp your first comment, I just added it to your vote.–SentryTalk 23:40, 1 December 2006 (UTC)