Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Empirereborn.net

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete - Sikon 13:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC).

Empirereborn.net (talk - history - links - logs)

Notable? -- Ozzel 01:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Keep

  1. KEJ 07:34, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. If it has 800 members, I'd say that's worthwhile. Kuralyov 23:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Alas, it seems to meet our notability requirements. jSarek 07:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Merge

Redirect

Delete

  1. I don't think so. -- Ozzel 01:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. No way, and I don't think this even should be voted on, I'm putting a speedy tag on it. - JMAS 01:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. What? Bleh. .... 07:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. —Xwing328(Talk) 01:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. Imp ATATatarismall.png 23:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. --Windu223 00:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
  7. Wildyoda 03:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
  8. Green Tentacle (Talk) 10:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
  9. Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 10:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
  10. Not relevant. Not needed. Darth Anxor(Rule the Galaxy) Revanchist Sith 02:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  11. Yep. Chack Jadson 14:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  12. Per Anxor. Darthchristian (Hey!) 21:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Sorry Kuralyov, but 800 members isn't so much. It may seem like it. But when it comes to an online community,2,000 is more like it.--Windu223 00:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

  • BS. Kuralyov 05:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Wookieepedia:Notability of fan projects puts a suggested lower limit of "100 active users." So, unless 700 of those users aren't very active, Empirereborn.net passes those criteria. —Silly Dan (talk) 14:01, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
      • They barely meet that criteria. From their own site: Official Rosters currently stand at 153 active Imperials, with an overall membership count of 834 officers...!  src. And honestly, that is a pretty ambiguous mark for criteria. If there are 100 users active out of 150 total, yes, that's a high percentage. But 153 active out of 834 total is not a very high percentage of active users. Shouldn't the critera be set by what percentage of overall users they have are active? - JMAS 14:18, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
        • Then the question becomes: do they do anything that is unique to Star Wars fan sites, RPG sites, etc? -- Riffsyphon1024 07:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)