Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Dark Spirit

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus between keep or merge.—Silly Dan (talk) 01:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Dark Spirit (talk - history - links - logs)

Keep

  1. Rodtheanimegod4ever 01:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
  2. I'm weighing in on this side, somehow. Cutch 06:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
  3. If it's canon. -- I need a name (Complain here) 23:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
  4. It is canon. Darth Raul (join the sith order)
  5. Just because something conflicts with other sources doesn't mean we should delete it. Charlii 10:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  6. Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 22:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  7. Cato Neimoidia 17:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
  8. It's in the movies -NighthawkLeader 07:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  9. Per Charlii. —Silly Dan (talk) 21:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete

  1. DarthMRN 16:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
  2. Havac 18:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
    Din's Fire 997 01:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
    Or merge with something else.--Valin Kenobi 03:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Merge with Dark Side Cave

  1. Merge. I don't think this entity is a specific, sapient spirit, but rather a manifestation of the Dark Side itself specific to the location. jSarek 21:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  2. Valin Kenobi 21:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  3. Din's Fire 997 06:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
  4. Havac 08:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
  5. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 22:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  6. Vryce 17:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  7. Imp 16:51, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
  8. Cull Tremayne 20:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
  9. Milo Fett[Comlink] 00:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
  10. —Xwing328(Talk) 17:00, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  11. Leader 17:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  12. JMAS 17:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

  • Unless the validity of provided source can be verified, I think this should go. It seems that current Canon treats occurences like this as Force Illusions or visions. DarthMRN 16:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Leland sez.... Toys are C-Canon. C-Canon cannot overrule C-Canon. Rodtheanimegod4ever 01:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
      • The toys may be, but what about the source for that article? Did it come from the toymakers website? Was it written on the package? I think neither of those are C-canon. But the toy itself might be. DarthMRN 04:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
        • Neither. It's from those little, totally-canonical gems, the Force Files. Remember them? They gave us R5-D8 and crap like that. Rodtheanimegod4ever 22:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
          • Having that Force File handy would be nice. Even if the thing turns out to be canon, I seriously doubt it's validity as a character. DarthMRN 08:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
          • [1] I still don't totally buy it as canon, since it goes against what else we know about The Cave.--Valin Kenobi 08:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
          • [2] would be a better link. The other pages reinforce the idea that this is a singular individual. -- Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 22:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
            • It's vague whether it's a lifeforce or The Force itself. -- Riffsyphon1024 22:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
              • Agreed. If we take it literally, "this spirit is the embodiment of the dark side of the Force" indicates that it's not - it's the dark side itself, given form. This is consistent with other sources, which always indicate that the cave itself possessed dark properties, but never mention actual discrete spirits existing there. jSarek 04:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)