This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Keep, probably with a rename. —Silly Dan (talk) 02:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Contents
Category:Willow ([[Talk:Category:Willow|talk]] - history - links - logs)
My understanding was that we treat Andowyne and everything related as in-universe, even if non-canon. (By the way, I'm by no means an inclusionist, but has it ever been explicitly said anywhere that the Andowyne Databank articles are non-canon?) Do we need Category:Star Trek for Jean-Luc Picard and NCC-1701? Or Category:Indiana Jones for Jones, Shorty and Atlantis? - Sikon 14:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep
- Milo Fett[Comlink] 00:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- —Xwing328(Talk) 17:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kuralyov 04:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Redirect
#Easily fixed by picking an in-universe name, like "Things from Andowyne" or somesuch. jSarek 20:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Rename to Category:Andowyne
- Sikon 17:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- LtNOWIS 04:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Vryce 04:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- jSarek 02:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- I don't think this category is hurting anything. It has plenty of articles to fill it up, and we don't want to just dump those in the main "non-canon articles" category. The others you mentioned don't have enough articles (as of now) to warrant a category, IMO. —Xwing328(Talk) 17:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)