Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Ambassador

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep - Sikon [Talk] 09:41, 21 April 2006 (UTC).

Contents

  • 1 Ambassador
    • 1.1 Delete
    • 1.2 Keep
    • 1.3 Comments

Ambassador

Obvious. For a precedent, see Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Primary Target. - Sikon [Talk] 05:25, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Delete

Keep

  1. As long as this article can be expanded, or examples can be given, it should stay - TopAce 13:10, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
  2. Keep. I was against deleting the precedent, and I'm against deleting this one as well. KEJ 13:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
  3. Keep and expand. Xwing328 01:08, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
  4. Keep as per my comment below. - Lord Hydronium 02:38, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
  5. Keep, as Lord Hydronium said. It's not a term, it's a title--The Erl of the Wookieepedia talk What I do 14:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
  6. The article needs serious work, but keep. Somebody needs to make a list of ambassadors for it. Red XIV 01:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments

I think we should use pages like Senator or Admiral as examples for this, and use it to list known Ambassadors. Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Palace as precedent. - Lord Hydronium 05:50, 16 April 2006 (UTC)