Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights/RFR archive/Omicron

< Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights | RFR archive
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for rollback that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Omicron (8 admin + 12 users/0/0)

Two week deadline from first request, voting ends on March 31, 2012.

Support

  1. Omicron has been a member of the wiki since 2006. A hard-working editor, Omicron is a common sight in the RCs, spending much of his time doing various maintenance tasks. He also does a huge load of anti-vandalism work; reverting vandalism, removing speculation, as well as tagging articles for deletion. Giving Omicron rollback would make his anti-vandal crusades smoother and faster — something that we all benefit of. 1358 (Talk) 00:24, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per Xd. I was in fact preparing to nominate Omicron myself. Many-a-time I've seen Omicron monitoring the RC, reverting vandalism and tagging articles with proper tags, as Xd said. In fact, many times I have gone to revert vandalism, only to get an "edit-conflict" message because Omicron has already taken care of it. He does a terrific job with this, and Rollback would help him do this even quicker and better.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 00:42, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Full support. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 02:27, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Why not? —MJ— Council Chambers Saturday, March 17, 2012, 02:31 UTC
  5. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 02:59, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 03:33, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  7. I've only been on here a bit over a year, and only regularly contributed since October. But in the short-ish time I've been here, Omicron has already made a definite impression on me as an even-handed, level-headed, and absolutely solid contributor. I can't think of any compelling reason not to vote for him/her. – DigiFluid 05:36, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  8. Six years is a long time to go without candy. jSarek 06:21, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  9. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 06:23, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  10. Because candy is good. Trak Nar Ramble on 06:24, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  11. CC7567 (talk) 09:13, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  12. Imperators II(Talk) 10:20, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  13. I'm not in favor of calling this a "handing out candy" situation or a "why not." When someone is dedicated to help keep Wookieepedia clean from vandalism, it really shows. Omicron deserves this privilege. JangFett (Talk) 12:28, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  14. Per MJ. Clone Commander Lee Talk 12:32, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  15. Certainly. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 14:31, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  16. Jinzler 19:57, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  17. To let him access that ion cannon on the Super Star Destroyer. TK999 20:04, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  18. nayayen★talk 20:19, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  19. Per Jang. Wookieepedia does not operate on entitlements. There is no such thing as candy. Wookieepedia is a meritocracy. Omicron has earned this privilege. Good work, Omicron. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:28, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  20. Meritocracy, indeed. graestan(talk) 21:58, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Optional candidate Q&A

  1. Why should you be granted rollback rights?
  • I just want to help make this wikia the best source of Star Wars knowledge on the web. I spend a lot of time here, and this will help me do that. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:00, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Nomination accepted via IRC. 1358 (Talk) 00:24, March 17, 2012 (UTC)