Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights/RFR archive/Jorrel Fraajic

< Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights | RFR archive
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for rollback that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Jorrel Fraajic (1 bureaucrat + 8 admins + 6 users/0/0)

Two week deadline from first request, voting ends September 3, 2007.

Support
  1. Thefourdotelipsis 09:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  2. Like . . . oh, you all know what it's like by now. jSarek 09:56, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  3. Despite never finishing Waru. Green Tentacle (Talk) 10:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  4. Imperialles 11:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  5. -- AckbarSigdmirableAckbar (It's A Trap!) 11:17, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  6. Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 11:23, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  7. Gonk! Gonk (Gonk!) 12:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  8. Darth Culator (Talk) 13:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  9. Joker1138(Mandalore) Neo-Crusader emblem19:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  10. POOWWWAAHHHHHHHHHH! Jediknight19bby (Jedi High Council Chambers!) 16:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
  11. Lord Hydronium 03:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
  12. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 15:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
  13. —Xwing328(Talk) 16:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
  14. Jedipilot94 (*Fo-Shizzle*) 01:01, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
  15. Most definitely. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 18:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
  16. Havac 20:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  17. Cull Tremayne 21:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  18. LtNOWIS 23:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
  19. Greyman(Paratus) 00:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  20. Graestan Jedi Order (This party's over) 00:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral
Optional candidate Q&A
Comments
  • The man has proven himself to be an active and dedicated member of this community, he's earned his keep with some large contributions, and an FA to boot. I know that's not the reason for giving rollback, but he hasn't, to my knowledge, delved into petty dispute (more than I can say for myself), and has never given anyone any reason to suspect that he is untrustworthy in any way, shape or form. He may not have been active of late, but everyone needs a break sometime. That doesn't seem to me to be a legit reason to hide the candy responsibility. Hell, I would have nominated him for adminship, but I have the sneaking suspicion that age fails to permit. Thus, rollback. Thefourdotelipsis 09:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Your sneaking suspicion is correct, although even if I was the correct age I would turn down the offer. At least, I think I would. Sigh. I cave way too easily, methinks. Jorrel Wiki-shrinkable Fraajic 12:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)