Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights/RFR archive/I need a name

< Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights | RFR archive
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for rollback that was successful. Please do not modify it.

I need a name (1 bureaucrat+9 admins+13 users/0/0)

Two week deadline from first request, voting ends March 15, 2007.

Support
  1. As I told him on his talk page, he seems to have either reported or reverted a large proportion of the vandals I've blocked recently. —Silly Dan (talk) 22:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. Per Silly Dan. --Yoshi626 22:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  3. Imp 22:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  4. Green Tentacle (Talk) 22:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  5. Double edit-conflicted strong support. G.He(Talk!) 22:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  6. As long as its only for reverting vandals. -- Riffsyphon1024 22:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  7. As much as I pretend that the feature doesn't exist, I'm not opposed to Ineedaname having it. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 22:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  8. Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 22:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  9. Since it doesn't affect me, I refuse to acknowledge that this "giverollback" tool exists. But I wouldn't be opposed to giving INAN the rollback power if such a tool did exist. -- Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 22:24, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  10. INAN is a worthy member for this, which does exist. Culator, stop hiding in denial. :-P JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 03:43, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  11. Definitely. -- Ozzel 03:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  12. Azizlight 11:19, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  13. Cull Tremayne 11:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC) -- One more vote couldn't hurt.
  14. Chack Jadson 20:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  15. LtNOWIS 22:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  16. —Xwing328(Talk) 22:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  17. He replyed on my talkpage,guess thats good enough...Gyasz Kudeb 01:11, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
  18. Havac 07:20, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
  19. Why not?--SWME 19:39, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
  20. JMAS 19:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
  21. Support. jSarek 22:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  22. Thought for sure I'd already voted. INAN deserves this, but only since he refuses even more POWAHH!! Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 22:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  23. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 20:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
  24. On my wiki he helps out a lot, so I know he will do a good job here. Darth tader(General) MandalorianKOTOR 23:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  25. For those about to rollback— fire! (boom)— we salute you. 137.81.215.158 15:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)<-- Gack! That was me. Somehow I was not logged in. Dunno why. Sorry. —Gonk (Gonk!) 15:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
  26. SFH 03:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral
Optional candidate Q&A
Comments

Unless over a dozen people come out of nowhere to vote against this, I suggest that since he's passed the most stringent proposed criteria at Forum:Rollback rights, the bureaucrats promote him sometime tomorrow. —Silly Dan (talk) 01:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)