Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights/RFR archive/Grunny

< Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights | RFR archive
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for rollback that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Grunny (10 admins + 9 users/0/0)

Support
  1. I am more than pleased to nominate Grunny for Wookieepedia’s Rollback rights. Grunny is an absolute machine when it comes to patrolling the Recent Changes, and he shows an excellent faculty for being able to distinguish between what requires a reversion and what does not. He’s an anti-vandal crusader who has a sound mind as to what constitutes a quality article, as evidenced by the great impression he’s made on both the FAN and GAN pages. I don’t feel there’s anyone who deserves this privilege more, and this is a great way to further reward an excellent user who, as of this post, has just recently been admitted to the AgriCorps review panel. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  2. GRUNNY IS VICTORIOUS ON ALL FRONTS! Graestan(Talk) 21:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  3. Per Tope. Grunny is a great editor and, as Tope put it, an anti-vandalism crusader. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 21:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  4. Just take it easy, that's the rule. Chack Jadson (Talk) 21:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  5. The latest choice for one of our illustrious popularity contests. Good job, Grunny, hope you're built Ford-tough, because you'll need to be as you climb the Wookieepedia ladder of political "funtime"…—Tommy Dark side Master SWGTCG (Nine two eight one) 22:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  6. [inevitable comment about candy] -- Darth Culator (Talk) 22:30, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  7. I usually spend most of my time on here patrolling recent changes, and I see Grunny's name on there all the time. There have even been occasions when I've given up on RCs for a few hours because he beats me to everything; he's just that good. Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 23:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  8. Excellent choice. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 23:57, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  9. I'm not sure if there is anything else left to say that hasn't been said already. Grunny really does deserve this. Cylka-talk- 00:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
  10. Per Darth Culator. jSarek 04:37, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
  11. --Eyrezer 05:10, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
  12. Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 08:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
  13. Previous anti-vandalism work + good temperament = worthy candidate. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
  14. —Silly Dan (talk) 11:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
  15. Really good editor, does brilliant work on recent change patrol. — RC-1136 Hate Mail Here 09:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
  16. He beats me to it every time. Reversion, {{delete}}, {{verify}}, you name it, he does it. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 09:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
  17. IFYLOFD (Come with me if you want to live.) 18:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  18. I haven't been back from being AWOL for very long but Grunny is one of those I have noticed to be very active and deserving of the ability to use this vital anti-vandal function. :-) — beeurd talk 19:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  19. LtNOWIS 19:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
Question
  1. Why should you be granted rollback rights?
    • For the most basic reason; so I can revert vandalism more efficiently. I am online for a good portion of every day, and keep a constant eye on the RCs while I'm editing other articles. I am also generally on the irc while I'm online, so I am able to bring persistent vandals to an admin's attention. I am glad to see that I have earned the trust of my fellow Wookieepedians in being nominated for rollback, and will endeavor to use this privilege responsibly :-). Grunny (Talk) 05:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)