Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights/RFR archive/Gonk

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for rollback that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Gonk (2 bureaucrats + 9 admins + 8 users/0/0)

Two week deadline from first request, voting ends July 5, 2007.

Support

1. Imperialles 00:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Sure. Why not? It's like candy. Atarumaster88 ^{(Talk page)} 04:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Like Ataru, like candy. jSarek 04:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
   • Beat everyone to it this time :-P Atarumaster88 ^{(Talk page)} 04:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
     • Yes, yes you did. Consider me pwned. ;-) jSarek 05:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Ozzel 05:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Kuralyov 05:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
6. School of Thrawn 101 05:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 08:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
8. Greyman^(Paratus) 18:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
9. —Silly Dan _(talk) 21:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
10. POWAH! LIMITED POWAH! -- Darth Culator ^(Talk) 21:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
11. AdmirableAckbar 21:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Jedimca0 ^{(Do or Do Not, There is No Try)} 22:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
13. --Windu223 14:08, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
14. Gonk gonk... -- Riffsyphon1024 03:58, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
15. hehe...candy. :) WhiteBoy 18:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
16. I need a name (Complain here) 18:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
17. <insert "candy" statement here>, <insert "LIMITED POWAHH" statement here> -- ^Jorrel _Fraajic 03:19, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
18. Damn you, Jorrel Fraajic.--Lord Oblivion^{Sith holocron} 23:01, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
19. Sure. "Limited power" LOL! -Fnlayson 14:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
20. Havac 20:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

1. It's not adminship. Havac 01:29, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
   • Yeah, well, voting down rollback rights isn't likely to change his mind on that. jSarek 04:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
     • Besides, user rights are progressive. I say one step at a time. --School of Thrawn 101 05:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
       • Per Thrawn here. Not to mention you are opposing his holiness, G*nk. You should be ashamed. ^Jorrel _Fraajic 03:19, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

• Accepted nomination on IRC. --Imperialles 00:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Optional candidate Q&A

• 1. Why should you be granted rollback rights?

Vandals... They're the scourge of any wiki. But to fight them, you need good users. Users who can be trusted to respond effectively, and quickly, when vandals strike. That's why you can never have too many rollbackers. So vote Gonk. For the future. For Wookieepedia. For freedom. (I'm Gonk, and I approve this message.) Gonk ^(Gonk!) 14:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)