Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights/RFR archive/Bella'Mia

< Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights | RFR archive
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for rollback that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Bella'Mia (3 admins + 7 users/2 admin + 6 users/0)

Two week deadline from first request, voting ends 28th of February, 2012.

Support
  1. Bella'Mia has been with Wookieepedia for upwards of three years and is a consistent face on Recent Changes. She has received several awards per her user page for which she has been helpful with users and in diplomacy across the wiki, not to mention a WOTM honor at the beginning of 2011. Her focus on Clone Wars and GAR material has been instrumental in keeping up with new materials every week. She works feverishly on correcting links, redirects, and other conflicts throughout the site. Providing Bella'Mia with access to Rollback would allow her to be more efficient with her time spent here, and would be to the benefit of the community. —Unsigned comment by Riffsyphon1024 (talk • contribs)
  2. Bella does one thing on Wookieepedia: improve a bunch of stuff. She's mature, diplomatic, easy-going, and experienced. Give her the tools to keep going. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 08:02, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Valentine's Day is a great day for giving out candy. And she's certainly earned it, as Riff and Trayus have attested. jSarek 09:19, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
    IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 13:29, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Rollin' back the vandals smokin' Embo sipping on juri juice... ~SavageBOB sig 13:35, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Clone Commander Lee Talk 13:37, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 16:12, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
    graestan(talk) 16:15, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
  7. Let's get this one on the first try. :P Menkooroo 16:17, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
  8. —MJ— War Room Tuesday, February 14, 2012, 16:33 UTC
  9. Imperators II(Talk) 19:09, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
  10. Nothing to say that hasn't already been said.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 00:02, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
Oppose
  1. I have to firstly say that Bella is a friendly user and a great editor. I have no doubt in my mind that she has extensive knowledge of Mandalorians and Clone Wars-related material. Even though she contributes at a high level, I don't see the point of granting her "candy" because of this. Per point three of this nomination page, I rarely see her engage in anti-vandal work, mostly prior to this nomination, and I don't think she needs this tool at this point in time. I am sorry to say this. JangFett (Talk) 21:17, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I, too, want to say that Bella is a tremendous user. She's friendly and very involved in many different things here. However, as Jang said, I have not seen her do extensive amount of anti-vandal work. I fail to see how rollback could benefit her. I'm sorry, Bella, but I don't think you're quite ready for rollback yet.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 21:30, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Was iffy on my vote, and Jang swayed me. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 00:51, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Per Jang here. Bella is an excellent asset to the wiki; however, I dont't see her being particularly active on the countervandalism front. This is exactly what requirement #3 says. Keep up the solid contributions, though. 1358 (Talk) 20:04, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
  5. I can totally see the reasoning behind giving Bella candy but, unfortunately, rollback is not candy. I very rarely see Bella in the RCs for reverting vandalism, so, per the above. But definitely keep up the brilliant work, Bella. —NAYAYEN 21:30, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Meh, pretty much per above. I don't normally see Bella in the RC at all, but that's probably because we edit at different times of the day. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 21:32, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
  7. Changing my vote per the above. Now is not yet the time; there haven't been enough reverts in the late-night spates of editing that Bella does. Any extension of user rights is potentially a complication for the site. As a former bureaucrat, I had to weigh things out too much before removing user rights for me to consider now giving them away, if someone does not appear to need them in the extreme and could potentially risk being gone long enough for us to consider having to remove them. Bella works hard at maintaining and adding to a specific set of articles, indeed she is a sort of unofficial WookieeProject leader in that respect. But those activities and the broader, more time-consuming activities of a "pre-admin" type that would normally be rewarded rollback are quite separate. graestan(talk) 01:01, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
  8. All is said already, so, go Bella! (: – Tm_T@Wookieepedia:~$ 13:46, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
Neutral
Optional candidate Q&A
  1. Why should you be granted rollback rights?
Comments
  • Accepted nomination via FB. -- Riffsyphon1024 07:47, February 14, 2012 (UTC)