Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights/RFB archive/Imperialles

< Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights | RFB archive
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for bureaucratship that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Imperialles (2 bureaucrats + 7 admins + 7 users/1 user/0)

Two week deadline from first request, voting ends 16th April 2007.

Support
  1. Green Tentacle (Talk) 12:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Sikon 12:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 13:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 13:48, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. YESSSSSS. Chack Jadson 17:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. SFH 00:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  7. .... 00:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  8. Has been here since the dawn of time, I mean Wookieepedia. Non-controversial user/admin. Has been incredably helpful. Represents Europe (Sikon technically represents Asia). In case of WhiteBoy not able to attend meetings and voice on issues, Imp is a backup. -- Riffsyphon1024 03:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  9. —Silly Dan (talk) 03:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  10. BambookidX 03:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  11. Yoshi626 04:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  12. Per Riffs. jSarek 04:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  13. Wooo! Darth Maddolis 05:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  14. Definitely. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 16:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  15.  G.He(Talk!) 21:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  16. Well, in the past i've been against the idea of having more 'crats, simply because we don't really need them. But eh, why not, Imp's proved that he's good for it. --Azizlight 02:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  17. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 11:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  18. Per Riff. tzzA 19:16, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  19. BubTalk 04:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Oppose
  1. Nothing against Imp. We just don't need more bureaucrats. Havac 04:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Neutral
Optional candidate Q&A
  1. Why do you think we need another bureaucrat?
    It's not so much about needing a bureaucrat, in my opinion. I'm fairly certain we could do perfectly fine with only one bureaucrat on this site (we have very few RFAs). Instead, I think it's about trust. Do you trust me with bureaucrat powers? If so, vote support.
  2. How do you see the difference between an admin and a bureaucrat?
    There is little difference. Bureaucrats are quite simply admins with the power to promote people to administrators.
  3. What will you use your new status for if your nomination succeeds?
    Not much. I will basically hand out rollback, admin and bureaucrat powers to successful nominees.
  4. How many admins do you think we need?
    If a user is worthy, and fulfills the requirements, I think he or she should be made an admin, regardless of the current number of sysops.
  5. How many bureaucrats do you think we need?
    The same as with admins. Although I think we should be more careful with handing out this power, as removing administratorship can only be done by Wikia staff.
  6. How often do you think bureaucrats should use their veto power on RFA?
    Whenever they feel that the nominee doesn't fulfill the requirements, or is likely to abuse his or her powers. --ATATatarismall.png 18:03, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  7. New question for Imperialles: What should happen to admins/bureaucrat candidates who disappear for awhile without warning, leaving many questions, projects, and that sort of thing hanging? ;-) —Unsigned comment by Atarumaster88 (talk • contribs)
    We should have patience with them. Their absence is likely due to reasons beyond their control. As for me, my absence was due to the fact that I had a job that required me to leave for weeks at a time. I no longer have that job. --ATATatarismall.png 20:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments