Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights/RFA archive/Quinlanfan

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Quinlanfan (1 user/1 bureaucrat + 4 admins + 12 users/0)

Support

1. Ramblinwreck90 21:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

1. No, just... no. -- I need a name (Complain here) 21:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
2. No. Redemption^Talk 21:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
3. Please be joking. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 21:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
4. No.--Lord Oblivion^{Sith holocron} 21:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
5. Sorry, but it's another big ol' "no" here - \\Captain Kwenn// ^{— Ahoy!} 21:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
6. This is so...the word "pathetic" comes to mind"--Herbsewell 22:03, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
7. Doesn't meet the 6 month rule. But i'm not sure Quinlanfan has even accepted this nomination, so don't be too harsh on him. --Azizlight 22:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
8. Sorry, but no. --Yoshi626 22:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
9. Clearly not 18. .... 22:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
10. Riffsyphon1024 22:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
11. Negative. Jorrel Fraajic 22:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
12. You have to be kidding. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 22:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
13. No. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 22:28, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
14. Is this some kind of joke? Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 22:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
15. <Histerical Laughter>--IG-Prime^(IG-2000) 22:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
16. What!? After all that mess you cause! No, no, no! Zainal 23:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

Why are we even having this vote? He doesn't meet the requirements.--Lord Oblivion^{Sith holocron} 21:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

• I already wrote this comment but someone deleted it. Anyway, I know this guy real well. I don't know anybody who knows more about star wars than him. I'm suprised he isn't an administrator already. He deserves to be an admin. Ramblinwreck90 22:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Is that reason enough? -- Riffsyphon1024 22:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
    • And Quinlanfan asked me personally to make him one, twice. I only showed him the door and he should now realize why it won't work. -- Riffsyphon1024 22:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
      • He doesn't know that much actually. We don't know if he's legally allowed to be here.--Herbsewell 22:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
        • When did he accept the nomination?--Herbsewell 22:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
          • It's more than likely that he asked Ramblinwreck90 to nominate him. -- I need a name (Complain here) 22:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
            • It's even more likely that he is Ramblinwreck90. .... 22:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
              • I don't think so.--Herbsewell 22:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• I'm not one to down on admin nominations, but at least look at the criteria please.

1. They have an account under a screenname. (yes)
2. They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki. No
3. They are of adult age (18 years or older). No
4. They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better. (32 article edits- you decide)
5. They have had at least some major article creations. (none)
6. They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner. (Being blocked for whining and harassment?)
7. They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation. (e-mailing Wikia staff over a block?)

Looking at things objectively, I have to say that a) I have never had dealings with Quinlanfan to my knowledge and b) He fails to satisfy most of the requirements listed above. Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 23:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

• Which would mean this isn't even a legitimate request and should simply be removed.--Lord Oblivion^{Sith holocron} 23:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
  • No. That means he'll just have to look like an idiot until he comes to his senses and asks us to take it down.--Herbsewell 23:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
    • <Ongoing Histerical Laughter><Sobbing><Sigh><Continued Histerical Laughter>--IG-Prime^(IG-2000) 23:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

I have decided that I don't want to be an adminastrator any more. I don't know why people that I have never talk to on here are voting against me. And I don't appreciate people insulting me or my best friend. For your information I happen to know a lot about star wars. So, I will get on here when I meet the "Requirements". I would like an apology from everyone who insulted me. And if it is okay with Riffsyphon1024 I am going to erase all of these INSULTS . But I will wait for his approvel. Please don't insult me or my friend anymore! I rest my case. Quinlanfan 23:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

• No one is insulting you, and no one needs to apologize. And if your so knowlegable, who gave Dooku his sloop?--IG-Prime^(IG-2000) 23:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Good luck getting any apologies. They are only stating fact. You are not admin material. And you are far from being admin material. And your whining right now does not help your case. --Redemption^Talk 23:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Stop being ignorant and read the requirements please.--Lord Oblivion^{Sith holocron} 23:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
    • I don't know why people that I have never talk to on here are voting against me. Therin lies your answer. .... 23:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• With webmates like you guys, who needs Sith Lords? Seriously ease up a little. You can comment, but just try to act nicely. -- SFH 23:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

The only notable things Quinlanfan has contributed here is making a great deal of noise over tiny issues like figures and getting blocked. So someone should remove this nomination soon. MyNz 22:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)