Wookieepedia:Re-featured article nominations/Mount Sorrow

< Wookieepedia:Re-featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a re-featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Mount Sorrow

  • Originally nominated by: Thefourdotelipsis
  • Last featured on: May 20, 2007
  • Changes since last review: diff
  • Date placed on this page: May 15, 2011

(3 Inqs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Inqvote I'm tired of people saying "play-by-play" like some kind of dirty word. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 16:37, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Happy to see this on the main page. :) Menkooroo 10:39, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
  3. One more User! Kilson(Let's have a chat) 04:28, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 04:45, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Object

  • Truthfully, I'm not really comfortable with the amount of play-by-play and extraneous info in the article. There's an entire section that doesn't include an appearance by Mt. Sorrow and only features other characters talking about him, and the following section is plagued with too-detailed descriptions of every single line and action from his interactions with the Ewoks. These all seem to be remnants of the original FA and not from the excellent sprucing-up that Green Tentacle did last fall to ensure that it was over a thousand words. I'm willing to clean this up myself and condense the play-by-play into appropriate brief summaries, but it would probably bring the article back under a thousand words and force it to lose its FA status. Does anybody object to that? Menkooroo 06:51, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
    • Agreed. The "The curing of Teebo" and "The perilous laughing spell" subsections could each be shortened and combined, which would likely drop it beneath the 1000 word mark. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 15:05, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
      • I've tried to cut some of the play-by-play down. Currently stands at 1001 words. Hopefully that's enough, otherwise I guess Sorrow's going to have a new reason to be depressed. Green Tentacle (Talk) 14:19, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (Inq only)

  1. Inqvote Three weeks of unaddressed objections. If nobody minds, I'll clean this one up, and if it ends up falling under a thousand words, bring it before the Inqs at the next meeting. Menkooroo 01:29, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
    Inqvote CC7567 (talk) 01:31, June 23, 2011 (UTC)