Wookieepedia:Inq/Meeting Thirty-two

< Wookieepedia:Inq
Wookieepedia > Wookieepedia:Inquisitorius > Inq/Meeting Thirty-two
TrianiiRanger-GAW
An Inq member prepares to defend the FAN page to the death.
Inquisition Meeting Times
Americas
UTC-12Saturday 24th 11:00
UTC-11Saturday 24th 12:00
UTC-10 (HST)Saturday 24th 13:00
UTC-9Saturday 24th 14:00
UTC-8 (PST)Saturday 24th 15:00
UTC-7 (MST)Saturday 24th 16:00
UTC-6 (CST)Saturday 24th 17:00
UTC-5 (EST)Saturday 24th 18:00
UTC-4 (AST)Saturday 24th 19:00
UTC-3 (NST)Saturday 24th 20:00
UTC-2Saturday 24th 21:00
Europe and Africa
UTC-1Saturday 24th 22:00
UTC/GMTSaturday 24th 23:00
UTC+1Sunday 25th 0:00
UTC+2Sunday 25th 1:00
Asia and Australasia
UTC+3Sunday 25th 2:00
UTC+4 (MSK)Sunday 25th 3:00
UTC+5Sunday 25th 4:00
UTC+6Sunday 25th 5:00
UTC+7 (NOVST)Sunday 25th 6:00
UTC+8 (AWST)Sunday 25th 7:00
UTC+9 (JST/KST)Sunday 25th 8:00
UTC+10 (AEST)Sunday 25th 9:00
UTC+11Sunday 25th 10:00
UTC+12Sunday 25th 11:00
"Tell them that beginning today, their lives depend on their being useful to us."
―Chack Jadson, speaking to a group of FA writers[src]

[Redacted by administration] gentlemen, it's time for that glorious occasion, the Inq meeting! It's been about 2 months since our last meeting; hopefully the next one will be in a month, rather than twice that time. Because of that, we've got a fair amount of articles to look over. But anyway, here's Inq meeting 32, guaranteed to be a doozy. It will be Saturday, April 24, at 7 pm EST, better known to you as 23:00 UTC, on that same day.

Stuff

Probed

New articles

  • Wampa–update.
  • Bevel Lemelisk–update.
  • Kowakian monkey-lizard–update.
  • Tiss'shar–update.
  • Uueg Tching–update.
  • Voren Na'al–update.
    • That guide is just Galaxy Guide 7, miniatures, and a map of Mos Eisley. Is that Update tag supposed to mean he wrote that Guide as well? NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 23:17, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
  • Halagad Ventor–citation needed.
  • Danni Quee–needs adjustments to fit LG; intro could use expansion (possibly also BTS); paragraph sizes could use standardization; ref 15 is invalid, as Wookieepedia is not a source and the forum thread contains no "official" posts, just fan speculation (the supposed quotes from officials on the first page cannot be verified). —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 04:12, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
    • I think I've adjusted your paragraph sizes and LG tweaks have been applied. I'm still looking for the official source that talked about the Knightfall trilogy, but I suspect it's on one of those SW.com threads that disappeared. BTS and intro have had small expansions, let me know either here or on my talk page what else you would like to see. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 21:35, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
  • Zsinj—update tag. Also, given the number of appearances and sources, it seems like a lot more can be said in the P&T. Worth clarifying with someone familiar with the material, at least. In addition, there seems to be at least one OOU-oriented "unknown" statement in the P&T—the article overall should be scoured for remnants from 2006-quality writing. CC7567 (talk) 06:39, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Octavian Grant–redlink in the infobox.
  • Eugene Talmont – update
  • Gandolo IV – update
  • Gha Nachkt – update

Items for discussion

  • I would like us to start being more strict in the removal of nominations that don't adhere to the FAN rules, especially rule 1. I think that part of the reason that the Inq has slowed down in its reviewing is that we sometimes need to spend a tremendous amount of energy and time on fixing up one nomination. That certainly can leave the reviewer with little motivation and energy to look at other noms. Cylka-talk- 20:29, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
  • Since there have been complaints about Inqs writing more articles than reviewing, I would like to propose that we implement a requirement that states for every three articles an Inq nominates, that person is required to review one article. Cylka-talk- 20:29, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Attendance

Ja

  1. Chack Jadson (Talk) 00:48, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
  2. TURD FERGUSON Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:12, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
    What Tope said. (IRC permitting, anyway) Jonjedigrandmaster Jedi symbol (We seed the stars) 01:13, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
    We'll see.—Tommy 9281 01:17, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
    I'll try my best. Consider my yes tentative. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 01:22, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Flurgy burgy. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 01:34, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
    Before we begin the meeting, I'd like to ask our members once again, please refrain from using ethnic slurs. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 15:19, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
  4. May have to leave early, but should be there. CC7567 (talk) 21:52, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Cylka-talk- 19:46, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Nein

  1. It went from 'should be able to come' to 'if I do, it would be a minor miracle.' I'll leave notes. Sorry, guys [Redacted by administration] — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 18:28, April 17, 2010 (UTC)
  2. My computer is out of commission for the foreseeable future & this just won't be feasible from my phone.—Tommy 9281 19:02, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Unlikely at the moment. Grunny (talk) 07:28, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Something's come up. I apologize for the short notice. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 15:31, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Something came up, and I can no longer guarantee it. I'll try, but right now it looks like a no. Jonjedigrandmaster Jedi symbol (We seed the stars) 20:42, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Kommentare

  1. As follows:
    • Keep everything except Cassus Fett Lok Durd.
    • Extend Jaina's probationary period per Ataru's request.
    • Probe everything except Bevel, Halagad, Beru, and Danni.—Tommy 9281 19:02, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
  • I am going to attend. --Imperialles 20:31, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

From Fiolli:

    • Chopping block:
      • Cassus Fett — keep or extend probe; I haven't had a chance to sort through those changes yet, but I trust that things have at least been touched by the responsible parties.
      • Bey — keep
      • Goran Beviin — keep
      • Jaina Solo — extend probe; these guys are working on it, and it needed a lot of work
      • Janu Godalhi — keep
      • Kol Skywalker — keep seems best
      • Marn Hierogryph — keep
      • Belindi Kalenda — keep
      • Cal Omas — keep
      • Onara Kuat — either kill or extend probe — I ask that succession box be removed as this objection has not been resolved; the dates in the box that remain are speculative and do not come from the databank, which only says "in the final years of the Republic." That does not necessarily equate to 22–19 BBY.
      • Grievous — kill
      • Lok Durd — kill
      • Harbinger — extend probe — There are still prose quality issues with one sentence paragraph, present conditional tense, and I'm not sold on the number of crew in the infobox as a viable figure.
      • Darth Maladi — keep
      • Ossus — keep
    • Newer stuff:
      • Wampa — keep
      • Bevel Lemelisk — keep
      • Kowakian monkey-lizard — keep
      • Tiss'shar — probe
      • Uueg Tching — probe
      • Voren Na'al — probe
      • Halagad Ventor — keep
      • Beru Whitesun Lars — keep
      • Danni Quee — keep
      • Zsinj — probe
      • Octavian Grant — keep
    • Other items:
      • Item 1: Not opposed to this, but we should give them a fair warning that it is not up to snuff and then a two or three week period before we start the removal vote unless it is so far beyond repair.
      • Item 2: There is a part of me that likes it and a part that does not. I abstain on this one, as it does not really effect me. I frankly do not care which way the body votes.
      • Adding new members: Not at this time. None of the one's I've heard mentioned meet my approval.
      • Have a good meeting, guys. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 22:29, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Jujiggum:
    • Probed articles: Kill Lok Durd and Grievous; extend probe Jaina per Ataru's request, and extend probe Harbinger and Onara Kuat per Fiolli above; keep the rest
    • New articles: Probe Tiss'shar, Uueg Tching, Voren Na'al, and Zsinj, and keep the rest.
    • Discussion Items:
      • Item I: I strongly support this.
      • Item II: I also support this, although I would prefer if it went more along the lines of 2 or 3 reviews per article nominated, rather than the other way around.
    • Jonjedigrandmaster Jedi symbol (We seed the stars) 22:52, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Minutes

Attendance

Articles on probation

New examinations

Items discussed

  • Agreed to be more strict in enforcing the FAN rules, especially rule 1. Articles falling below the required standard will be given a warning, with a removal vote started two or three weeks later unless significant improvements are made.
  • Agreed that Inquisitors should aim to review roughly as many articles as they nominate. This is regarded as a common sense responsibility with no firm policy enacted.
  • Imperialles suggested that the Inquisitorius should be phased out in the long term in favor of a system where all users were responsible for voting for and maintaining featured articles.