Wookieepedia:Inq/Grievous (Third review)

< Wookieepedia:Inq
Wookieepedia > Wookieepedia:Inquisitorius > Inq/Grievous (Third review)

Grievous

  • Status: Article (other options are "featured article nom", "featured article", and "former featured article")

Things to do

  • A lot of sourcing. Most of the BtS is unsourced and a few paragraphs throughout are unsourced.
  • The continuity issues, while they might be messy, should be explained so the reader knows what is conflicting.
  • General cleanup of language in the BtS.

Comments

I am requesting that this article be reviewed by the Inquisitorius and stripped of FA status if the article does not meet the organization's standards. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 16:16, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

  • This section's really for non-FAs that people want feedback on. But we'll stick it on the list for the next meeting. Green Tentacle (Talk) 16:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
    • Thank you, GT. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 16:24, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
      • I'm working on it Fiolli. Hopefully I'll be able to clean it up. Gosh, this TCW stuff is a pain. As for your first objection, some of the BTS paragraphs are self-referenced, so no reference or fact tag is needed. Chack Jadson (Talk) 16:33, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
        • Thanks, Chack. I'm not sure I fully understand what is self-sourcing in this article, but I'll leave that to the members of the Inqery who are supposed to know. TCW stuff is a mess, and I apologize for resurrecting it. Hopefully you'll be able to make sense out of it, Chack. Thanks for your hard work on this article. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 16:38, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
          • No problem. Thanks for bringing it to my attention that this article was subpar. The only stuff that's gonna give me grief is TCW, and that's not your fault. :PChack Jadson (Talk) 16:48, 24 December 2008 (UTC)