- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Ylesian white worm
- Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:21, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:Some incredibly interesting worms for the burner.
(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)
Support
- 501st dogma(talk) 19:11, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
Assuming Fred's satisfaction with the objections. - Sir Cavalier of One
(Squadron channel) 11:02, June 27, 2013 (UTC)- Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:35, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
Xd1358. (This support vote is being placed with Xd1358's expressed permission, as he is currently in a read-only capacity. You may request IRC logs for confirmation of this vote. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:49, July 16, 2013 (UTC))- Frd pls. Cade Calrayn 19:56, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
Object
501st
Alphabetize the categories.- Woops fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:45, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
You could probably add to the intro that they dwelt in the mud, just to lengthen that section.501st dogma(talk) 17:56, June 2, 2013 (UTC)- Added in. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:45, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
From teh Frd Shd
The second sentence of the biology section currently states that the stage is small enough to eat, not the worm during the stage. Please reword.- Reworded. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:32, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
I highly doubt a Hutt could even think of eating millions of the worms. Is this an expression used by a character in the book? If so, please state as much.- Oddly enough its actually stated in the Essential guide to planets and moons in the caption for the worm image which states "It takes millions of Ylesian white worms to fill a Hutt." This isn't a quote and seems official since it's a sourcebook although I agree it's ridiculous. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:32, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
The first sentence of the Bts is currently arranged in a very random order. Please rearrange it so that the details on the mention are together and the details about the book itself together. I hope that makes sense. :PMasterFred(Whatever) 20:31, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
- Changed the location of the date, is that now better or does more need to change? Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:32, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
Objection(s) overridden by AgriCorps 20:27, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 20:27, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
- I actually just noticed this now, post-support vote. I usually leave an objection for this type of thing: I notice that you provide page/chapter numbers for both reference notes except for Paradise Snare. To keep it uniform, can you also use chapter numbers for the PS referencing? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:54, July 16, 2013 (UTC)