Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Yils

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Yils

  • Nominated by: Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 19:14, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Project Hero. This one was a bit tricky.

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 21:21, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:53, August 31, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ACvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 04:15, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Dangit, Cade. Make mistakes so I can object for once. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 19:00, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  5. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 09:58, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • The way the article introduces this conversation is rather jarring. It refers to "the discussion of how the Sith captured the research facility," as if we know what the discussion is. The article does not reference this previously: "...and joined the discussion of how the Sith had captured the research facility."
  • How is this not speculation? I understand there are multiple options here according to which game play route you choose, but we try to avoid speculating like this and instead offer some kind of ambiguous resolution. "either by the Knight's use of the Force or Hark's offer to remain in custody until the Jedi returned." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:22, August 31, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 09:59, September 8, 2013 (UTC)


  • Not really an objection, but a clarification; there are no light-side conversation options? Just two neutral and a dark side one? - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 15:01, September 5, 2013 (UTC)