Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Yacombe

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Yacombe

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Panther436 (talk) 22:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 21:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Provided the objections below end up resolved —spookywillowwtalk 20:26, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Nice work! TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:43, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
  5. Booply (talk) 00:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Object

Panther
  • Love this. The Dooku: Jedi Lost to High Republic pipeline is real! First, Oliviah was a Knight not a Padawan, which will need another citation I believe.
    • I checked the sources that mention her, but I didn't find anything about her being a Knight. I just removed Padawan because she's always referred to as "Jedi Oliviah." LucaRoR (Talk) 17:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
  • The Lonto being a species needs a cite to that Cavan Scott tweet like on the Lonto article; there's nothing that really indicates that in Peace and Unity
    • Done, thanks. LucaRoR (Talk) 17:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Cavan Scott did a blog post Q&A where he said that the Yacombe's design were based on that early THR Phil Noto concept art, worthy of being in the BTS Panther436 (talk) 16:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Susalee's statement about them being strictly neutral and striving for balance seems like it should be included in the description.
    • Done, thanks. LucaRoR (Talk) 14:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
  • I'd like just a tiny bit of context for why the Herald brought them up to the crowd and/or what he was trying to do. Panther436 (talk) 00:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
    • How's that? I wouldn't go more in depth because it's not directly related to the Yacombe… LucaRoR (Talk) 14:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Could definitely use a picture of the envoy for an infobox image Panther436 (talk) 21:35, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
    • The current precedent is that we do not use a single individual to repersent a group in the infobox unless it's a species. LucaRoR (Talk) 21:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
      • Seems silly not to for an individual whose clothing/appearance is directly related to and representative of that organization, but okay. Panther436 (talk) 22:10, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Lew
  • You can remove the founded by date for redunancy Lewisr (talk) 16:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
    • The precedent is not consistent here, but done. LucaRoR (Talk) 17:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
      • We're working on it :P Lewisr (talk) 03:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
  • No quote for description? Lewisr (talk) 16:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
    • How's that? LucaRoR (Talk) 17:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Anil
  • Does THR Encyclopedia confirm that the Yacombe did renounce their allegiance to the dark side? If so, I don't think adding "as stated by a Ximpi proxy" is necessary in Description as that's already covered in History.
  • In BTS, could you please clarify that Project Luminous is THR project? TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
    • So sorry for the delay, done. LucaRoR (Talk) 13:44, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 00:12, 2 December 2023 (UTC)