- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Veraslayn Kast
- Nominated by: Cevan
(talk) 20:20, January 8, 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: I shouldn't be going over the word count this time.
(3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)
Support
- Lewisr (talk) 02:48, January 9, 2017 (UTC)
Don't limit yourself. :P Imperators II(Talk) 12:25, January 9, 2017 (UTC)- Are split articles meant to have NOTOC? Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:39, January 10, 2017 (UTC)
- —Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 12:36, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
- Be careful of using "which" when it should grammatically be "that." Other than that, good work. MasterFred
(Whatever) 21:42, April 25, 2017 (UTC)
Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:25, July 18, 2017 (UTC)
1358 (Talk) 21:34, July 30, 2017 (UTC)
Object
Ecks Dee
Can we establish some sort of timeline in the intro as well?1358 (Talk) 11:45, June 21, 2017 (UTC)I'm not convinced the civil war factions are necessary to mention in the intro, or if you insist, you need to tie it to the rest of the intro (i.e. the Death Watch - Shadow Collective relationship).1358 (Talk) 22:18, July 5, 2017 (UTC)
Toprawa
If the character does not appear in Galactic Atlas, then that source cannot be used outright as a reference for the character's 19 BBY death date. Doing so is tantamount to telling the reader that Galactic Atlas explicitly says that Veraslayn Kast died in 19 BBY, which it of course does not. Since you are extrapolating this conclusion from secondary pieces of information, you need to manually explain the rationale you used to reach this conclusion in a reference note so that the reader understands where this information is coming from.Rather than using Amazon, a secondary source, to reference the book's publication date, please refer to the Star Wars Propaganda article and employ its primary source, the publisher's website.Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:59, July 18, 2017 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:34, July 30, 2017 (UTC)