Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Veraslayn Kast

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Veraslayn Kast
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Ecks Dee
        • 1.1.2.2 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Veraslayn Kast

  • Nominated by: Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:20, January 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I shouldn't be going over the word count this time.

(3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. Lewisr (talk) 02:48, January 9, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Don't limit yourself. :P Imperators II(Talk) 12:25, January 9, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Are split articles meant to have NOTOC? Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:39, January 10, 2017 (UTC)
  4. —Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 12:36, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Be careful of using "which" when it should grammatically be "that." Other than that, good work. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 21:42, April 25, 2017 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:25, July 18, 2017 (UTC)
  7. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 21:34, July 30, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Ecks Dee
  • Can we establish some sort of timeline in the intro as well? 1358 (Talk) 11:45, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
    • Is that all right? Cevan IMPpress (talk) 15:38, June 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • I'm not convinced the civil war factions are necessary to mention in the intro, or if you insist, you need to tie it to the rest of the intro (i.e. the Death Watch - Shadow Collective relationship). 1358 (Talk) 22:18, July 5, 2017 (UTC)
    • I've added that Death Watch was a founding member of the Shadow Collective in the intro. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 20:29, July 9, 2017 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • If the character does not appear in Galactic Atlas, then that source cannot be used outright as a reference for the character's 19 BBY death date. Doing so is tantamount to telling the reader that Galactic Atlas explicitly says that Veraslayn Kast died in 19 BBY, which it of course does not. Since you are extrapolating this conclusion from secondary pieces of information, you need to manually explain the rationale you used to reach this conclusion in a reference note so that the reader understands where this information is coming from.
    • Fixed. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 23:15, July 18, 2017 (UTC)
  • Rather than using Amazon, a secondary source, to reference the book's publication date, please refer to the Star Wars Propaganda article and employ its primary source, the publisher's website. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:59, July 18, 2017 (UTC)
    • Changed to the Harper Collins template. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 23:15, July 18, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:34, July 30, 2017 (UTC)