Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Uviuy Exen/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Uviuy Exen/Legends
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Anil
        • 1.1.2.2 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Uviuy Exen/Legends

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 17:41, September 10, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 12:41, September 11, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:38, September 21, 2019 (UTC)
  3. User:Spookywilloww/Sig2 10:19, September 27, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:43, October 1, 2019 (UTC)
  5. Fan26 (Talk) 18:49, October 1, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Anil
  • Category:Fortress worlds is currently a subcategory of Category:Galactic Empire planets, which technically makes the latter category redundant in this article. However, I'm not sure if the term "fortress world" only applies to Imperial planets. If that's not the case, then the categories should be separated.
    • Good point, and no, fortress worlds weren't used just by the Empire. Corrected that category. Imperators II(Talk) 07:44, September 11, 2019 (UTC)
  • I'd like to see a consistency in the use of {{C}} for the date addenda in the infobox. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:05, September 11, 2019 (UTC)
    • I've tried going with just the {{C}}. Imperators II(Talk) 07:41, September 11, 2019 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Citing the ideal minimum 400px rule, we can't go for a wider crop on the infobox image? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:16, September 26, 2019 (UTC)
    • Sure, wider crop uploaded. Imperators II(Talk) 06:13, September 27, 2019 (UTC)
  • Reference 1 needs to specify "Based on Uviuy Exen system" since the planet is not mentioned in the Online Companion.
    • Thanks, don't know how I missed that. Imperators II(Talk) 18:57, September 30, 2019 (UTC)
  • You must have known I was going to leave this objection. :D I think we can safely consider the planet to be terrestrial if Imperial Army line squads are deployed "on" the planet, per the source wording. As I reasoned on another of your recent nominations, they aren't floating through the air, so it's not a gaseous planet. Even if it's a waterworld, such planets are nonetheless classified as terrestrial. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:42, September 30, 2019 (UTC)
    • Added, but this really feels like a stretch to me. Imperators II(Talk) 19:57, September 30, 2019 (UTC)
      • I'm just going to repeat what I said on your other nomination. We only have three types of planet classifications. They're either terrestrial, water, or gaseous; waterworlds are a subset of terrestrial planets, so basically a planet is either solid or gaseous. It's a perfectly logical inference to make that an Imperial Army line squad of infantry soldiers described as being "on" a planet is not floating through the air of a gaseous planet; ergo, the planet is terrestrial. In no way is this a stretch. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:11, September 30, 2019 (UTC)
  • Can you explain your rationale for me in justifying why the "A world at a crossroads" subsection even needs to exist? I understand that these ships are traveling through the system on their hyperspace journeys, and I presume that you're including this information because we treat Atlas map dots as both planets and systems. But is there any evidence any of these vessels are stopping at the planet itself? Passing through a system isn't necessarily synonymous with passing by or stopping at a planet. It certainly seems like all of this information just belongs in the Uviuy Exen system article. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:28, September 30, 2019 (UTC)
    • Yeah, I debated this one with myself, but added the section nevertheless just to be sure. Removed. Imperators II(Talk) 07:56, October 1, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:51, October 1, 2019 (UTC)