- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Unidentified six-legged creature
- Nominated by: —Axinal Convocation Chamber 20:02, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Haven't done much for Project Ewoks, so here goes. Thanks to Xd and Toprawa for help with the opening quote!
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
Excellent. Graestan(Talk) 19:45, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Grunny (talk) 01:00, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:40, March 21, 2011 (UTC)- Sorry, I gave you one redlink to kill. ~ SavageBob 21:19, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Imperators II 21:38, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Object
Imperators II
Why does the infobox list its homeworld as "Endor" if the rest of the article uses "Forest Moon of Endor"? Shouldn't the naming be consistent? Imperators II 20:33, March 18, 2011 (UTC)- The name of the article for the moon is simply "Endor", I just wanted to use Forest Moon in the main article to specify. But, you have a point. Fixed.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 20:47, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
"[..] which featured a wide variety of terrains." Is this really relevant to the article about this particular species? Imperators II 21:21, March 21, 2011 (UTC)- I don't really see a problem with it. It may not be totally necessary, but it does not detract from the quality of the article in my opinion. I would state exactly what type of terrain/climate this creature preferred, except that we don't know.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 21:33, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Graestan
The speculation as to whether or not Gracca did it by accident does not belong; just state the facts. Graestan(Talk) 18:36, March 19, 2011 (UTC)- I removed the two statements referring to the specific creature, but left the fact that Gracca crystallized some animals deliberately and others accidentally.
File:Crystal creature.jpg and File:Latara flying.jpg could each use minimal cropping to get rid of the black lines. Graestan(Talk) 18:38, March 19, 2011 (UTC)- Fixed.
Assuming you really do intend for the article to be more about the species than the individual, era tags do not belong in species articles. Graestan(Talk) 18:45, March 19, 2011 (UTC)- Makes sense, addressed. Thanks for the copy-edits and the review, Graestan!—Axinal Convocation Chamber 19:22, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Toprawa
For basic formatting purposes and ease of referencing in editing view, I would ask that you please specify a pixel size for the body image.Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:13, March 21, 2011 (UTC)- Strange, I thought I already had. It's at 200px now. Thanks for the copy-edit and the review.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 20:31, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Nice job overall. I cleaned up some of the citeweb template formatting and adjusted the link to take the reader straight to that specific post on the page. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:40, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Strange, I thought I already had. It's at 200px now. Thanks for the copy-edit and the review.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 20:31, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 20:19, March 25, 2011 (UTC)