Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Unidentified male Imperial Knight II (Agamar)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified male Imperial Knight II (Agamar)

  • Nominated by: Menkooroo 15:17, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Cool beard!

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. I actually remembered to update the above header. :P MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 16:46, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
  2. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 23:51, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:43, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ACvote I went ahead and added appropriate context for Agamar, rather than leave the same objection on two noms. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 20:56, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
    • I really should have done that myself... sorry. :P Menkooroo 21:46, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Good job. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:58, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Fred strikes
  • "Everyone involved with the negotiations disguised themselves as farmers, and several Imperial Knights, including the bearded male, pretended to tend to a field nearby to the talks." Maybe change the ending a little. Reads kinda weird to me. May just be me, though. That's all I can see. —Unsigned comment by Master Fredcerique (talk • contribs)
    • How's this? Menkooroo 15:51, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
      • Better. Sorry for forgetting my sig. :P MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 16:43, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone
  • Same thing as with the other one: could you clarify why the "Bastion residents" category is being used here? CC7567 (talk) 01:59, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Just one. Can we move the bio quote up to be the lead quote, per what we did here? I think it would be appropriate. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:13, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
    • Huh. I was drawing on that precedent, but I remembered it completely backward --- I thought you had asked me to move it from leading to bio, as it was more relevant to his biography than to him as a character. Buuuuut, thinking about it, yeah, I like it better as a leading quote. Moved. Menkooroo 17:19, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:58, January 20, 2011 (UTC)


  • This is where we start getting into the background of this picture. I tried stretching the infobox image to 250px, but I thought it looked yucky. S'it OK at this size? Menkooroo 15:17, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
    • It's fine to me. If that's as large as it will get without distortion, then I would leave it. And is it just me, or does he look like a 25th century Chinese warrior? :P —Unsigned comment by Master Fredcerique (talk • contribs)