Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Unidentified human bartender (Akiva)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Unidentified human bartender (Akiva)
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Wok142
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Unidentified human bartender (Akiva)

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 23:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A friend pointed out that there was a missing detail or two (oops) but that pushed it just over, so voila.
  • Date Archived: 22:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 322 words (57 introduction, 243 body, 22 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 300 words (61 introduction, 217 body, 22 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 20:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
  2. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 15:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
  3. Wok142 (talk) 01:15, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
  4. ACvote JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 22:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 22:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Object

Wok142
  • Should Surat Nuat's gang be listed in the infobox under affiliation? And does it make sense to maybe mention it in the intro as well? Wok142 (talk) 22:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
    • Did briefly note that Nuat also led a gang in the body; but it's not clear if everyone working for Nuat/the Alcazar was part of his gang specifically.—spookywillowwtalk 21:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
  • What does "later introducing the former" mean in the introduction? Maybe I'm missing something but that sentence doesn't make sense to me. Wok142 (talk) 22:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
    • Chopped; think got left over from drafting.—spookywillowwtalk 21:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
  • I think it's worth noting that the bartender basically swindled Velus. You could mention that Velus was going to demand his credits back but at least make a note of how the bartender basically conned him out of 100 credits. Wok142 (talk) 22:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Did you also want to include the comparison of his likeness to a worrt since you included the comparisons to a Wookiee? You could say "Velus compared the bartender's unkempt appearance as similar to an individual of the Wookiee species and his slimy, sweaty skin to that of a worrt." Wok142 (talk) 22:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
    • Addressed two above.—spookywillowwtalk 21:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 22:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)