Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Unidentified female Imperial Knight (Agamar)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Unidentified female Imperial Knight (Agamar)
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Attack of the Clone
        • 1.1.2.2 Moffship
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Unidentified female Imperial Knight (Agamar)

  • Nominated by: Menkooroo 15:08, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Number two of a few more.

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 23:51, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 23:58, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:43, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 06:40, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Fantastic work. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 19:44, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Attack of the Clone
  • Could you explain why the "Bastion residents" category is being used? I don't see anything in the article that reflects this. CC7567 (talk) 01:55, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
    • Legacy Era Campaign Guide says that all the IK's live on Bastion --- I'd be OK removing the category, though, as it could be argued that we can't make that assumption about this particular IK. I'm usually not too keen on making assumptions; say the word and I'll vanquish it. Menkooroo 23:35, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
      • Yeah, that's what I would suggest; we don't want to assume too much, no matter what sources may generalize. CC7567 (talk) 06:33, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
        • Forsook! From the dude below, too. Menkooroo 23:44, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
Moffship
  • Some context is needed on Agamar in both the intro and body.
    • Added "the planet."
  • Something about the first two sentences in the body is bugging me for some reason. Could you take the first clause of the second sentence and merge it with the first sentence? This way, you can provide context on the Knights at their first mention and make it clearer that "that year" is referring to 137 ABY. I realize this might be an odd objection, but I feel that these changes will improve the flow of the article.
    • I changed it, but it was difficult to do without making the opening of the bio look a lot like this guy or this guy. :P Menkooroo 23:44, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • That's all. Good work. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 17:36, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thank you! Glory to the Emperor. Menkooroo 23:44, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 19:44, January 20, 2011 (UTC)


  • Again, sorry about presenting so many similar nominations in such close succession. I'm writing unique articles, though, rather than simply copying and pasting blocks of text. This gal's article is different than the last guy, and the dude below is different than both of them. They all present the same information, but in fresh ways. Hopefully it's not too repetitive or cumbersome to read them all. Menkooroo 15:08, January 7, 2011 (UTC)